Jessilyn Manimbao v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 18 JOINT STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 7, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2017)

1
2
3
4

Amir Q. Amiri (State Bar No. 271224)
[e-mail]
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

5
6

Attorneys for Defendant
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12

JESSILYN MANIMBAO,

13
14
15
16
17

Plaintiff,
v.
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC.; ET AL.,

Case No. 3:17-cv-00394-JST
Assigned to: Judge Jon S. Tigar
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
TO COMPLAINT

Defendants.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 3:17-cv-00394-JST

1

On January 25, 2017, Plaintiff Jessilyn Manimbao (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint in this

2

action. Given the large volume of Complaints requiring a response from Defendant Experian

3

Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”) at the same time, and in accordance with Local Rule 6-

4

1(a), Plaintiff and Experian agree to an extension for Experian to answer or otherwise respond to

5

the Complaint. Experian’s response to the Complaint is due April 3, 2017. To the extent that

6

Experian files a motion to dismiss in this case, Experian agrees that Plaintiff shall have 30 days to

7

respond. Experian will thereupon have 21 days for any reply.

8
9

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Experian, that
the deadline for Experian to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended until

10

April 3, 2017. Plaintiff’s deadline to respond to any motion to dismiss is extended to 30 days

11

from filing, and Experian’s deadline to reply in support of a motion to dismiss is extended to

12

21 days from filing the opposition.

13
14

Dated: March 3, 2017

15
16
17
18

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Jessilyn Manimbao

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

/s/ Elliot W. Gale
Elliot W. Gale (SBN 263326)
SAGARIA LAW, P.C.
2033 Gateway Place, 5th Floor
San Jose, CA 95110
Tele.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Dated: March 3, 2017

/s/ Amir Q. Amiri
Amir Q. Amiri (State Bar No. 271224)
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

26
27
28
-1-

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 3:17-cv-00394-JST

1
2

ECF CERTIFICATION
I, Amir Q. Amiri, hereby attest pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) that the concurrence to

3

the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.

4

Executed on March 3, 2017, at San Francisco, California.

5
6
7
8

/s/ Amir Q. Amiri
Amir Q. Amiri (State Bar No. 271224)
JONES DAY
Attorneys for Defendant
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 3:17-cv-00394-JST

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

The Court, having considered the parties’ Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time to

3

Respond to the Complaint, hereby extends Experian Information Solutions, Inc.’s (“Experian”)

4

deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to April 3, 2017. Plaintiff’s deadline to

5

respond to any motion to dismiss is extended to 30 days from filing, and Experian’s deadline to

6

reply in support of a motion to dismiss is extended to 21 days from filing the opposition.

7

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9
10

March 7, 2017
DATED: __________________________
The Honorable Judge Jon S. Tigar

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 3:17-cv-00394-JST