Jessilyn Manimbao v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 31

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 30 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE filed by TransUnion, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 27, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2017)

Download PDF
4 Christopher A. Ferguson, Esq. (IN #27833-49) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) Schuckit & Associates, P.C. 4545 Northwestern Drive Zionsville, IN 46077 Telephone: 317-363-2400 Fax: 317-363-2257 E-Mail: cferguson@schuckitlaw.com 5 Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 David Streza, Esq. (CSB #209353) Vogl Meredith Burke LLP th 456 Montgomery Street, 20 Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415-398-0200 Fax: 415-398-2820 E-Mail: dstreza@vmbllp.com Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) JESSILYN MANIMBAO, ) CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00394-JST Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) STIPULATION AND ) [PROPOSED] ORDER OF EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; ) DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE TRANSUNION, LLC; FIRST ELECTRONIC ) BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND BANK; and DOES 1 THROUGH 100 ) DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, INCLUSIVE; ) LLC ONLY Defendants. ) ) Plaintiff Jessilyn Manimbao (“Plaintiff”), by counsel, and Defendant Trans Union, LLC (“Trans Union”), by counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that all matters herein between them have been resolved, and that Plaintiff’s cause against Trans Union only should be dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:17-CV-00394-JST Page 1 of 3 Respectfully submitted, 1 2 3 Date: April 27, 2017 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 s/ Elliot W. Gale (with consent) Scott J. Sagaria, Esq. Elliot W. Gale, Esq. Joseph B. Angelo, Esq. Scott M. Johnson, Esq. Sagaria Law, P.C. 2033 Gateway Place, 5th Floor San Jose, CA 95110 Telephone: (408) 279-2288 Fax: (408) 279-2299 E-Mail: sjsagaria@sagarialaw.com egale@sagarialaw.com jangelo@sagarialaw.com sjohnson@sagarialaw.com 11 Counsel for Plaintiff, Jessilyn Manimbao 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Date: April 27, 2017 s/ Christopher A. Ferguson Chris Ferguson, Esq. Schuckit & Associates, P.C. 4545 Northwestern Drive Zionsville, IN 46077 Telephone: 317-363-2400 Fax: 317-363-2257 E-Mail: cferguson@schuckitlaw.com Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC David Streza, Esq. (CSB #209353) Vogl Meredith Burke LLP th 456 Montgomery Street, 20 Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415-398-0200 Fax: 415-398-2820 E-Mail: dstreza@vmbllp.com Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 25 26 27 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the Signatories. 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:17-CV-00394-JST Page 2 of 3 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Trans Union, LLC is 2 dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff and Defendant Trans Union, LLC shall each bear their own 3 costs and attorneys’ fees. 4 5 6 April 27, 2017 Date: ________________________ 7 ____________________________________ JUDGE, United States District Court, Northern District of California 8 9 DISTRIBUTION TO: 10 11 12 13 14 15 Elliot Wayne Gale, Esq. egale@sagarialaw.com Scott Joseph Sagaria, Esq. sjsagaria@sagarialaw.com David J. Streza, Esq. dstreza@vmbllp.com Christopher A. Ferguson, Esq. cferguson@schuckitlaw.com Scott Matthew Johnson, Esq. sjohnson@sagarialaw.com Joseph B. Angelo, Esq. jangelo@sagarialaw.com Amir Q. Amiri, Esq. aamiri@jonesday.com Taylor Robert Steinbacher, Esq. steinbachert@ballardspahr.com 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:17-CV-00394-JST Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?