Jessilyn Manimbao v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Filing
31
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 30 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE filed by TransUnion, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 27, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2017)
4
Christopher A. Ferguson, Esq. (IN #27833-49)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Schuckit & Associates, P.C.
4545 Northwestern Drive
Zionsville, IN 46077
Telephone: 317-363-2400
Fax: 317-363-2257
E-Mail: cferguson@schuckitlaw.com
5
Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
1
2
3
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
David Streza, Esq. (CSB #209353)
Vogl Meredith Burke LLP th
456 Montgomery Street, 20 Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415-398-0200
Fax: 415-398-2820
E-Mail: dstreza@vmbllp.com
Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
)
JESSILYN MANIMBAO,
) CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00394-JST
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
) STIPULATION AND
) [PROPOSED] ORDER OF
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; ) DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
TRANSUNION, LLC; FIRST ELECTRONIC
) BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
BANK; and DOES 1 THROUGH 100
) DEFENDANT TRANS UNION,
INCLUSIVE;
) LLC ONLY
Defendants.
)
)
Plaintiff Jessilyn Manimbao (“Plaintiff”), by counsel, and Defendant Trans Union, LLC
(“Trans Union”), by counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that all matters herein between them
have been resolved, and that Plaintiff’s cause against Trans Union only should be dismissed,
with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:17-CV-00394-JST
Page 1 of 3
Respectfully submitted,
1
2
3
Date: April 27, 2017
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
s/ Elliot W. Gale (with consent)
Scott J. Sagaria, Esq.
Elliot W. Gale, Esq.
Joseph B. Angelo, Esq.
Scott M. Johnson, Esq.
Sagaria Law, P.C.
2033 Gateway Place, 5th Floor
San Jose, CA 95110
Telephone: (408) 279-2288
Fax: (408) 279-2299
E-Mail: sjsagaria@sagarialaw.com
egale@sagarialaw.com
jangelo@sagarialaw.com
sjohnson@sagarialaw.com
11
Counsel for Plaintiff, Jessilyn Manimbao
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Date: April 27, 2017
s/ Christopher A. Ferguson
Chris Ferguson, Esq.
Schuckit & Associates, P.C.
4545 Northwestern Drive
Zionsville, IN 46077
Telephone: 317-363-2400
Fax: 317-363-2257
E-Mail: cferguson@schuckitlaw.com
Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union,
LLC
David Streza, Esq. (CSB #209353)
Vogl Meredith Burke LLP th
456 Montgomery Street, 20 Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415-398-0200
Fax: 415-398-2820
E-Mail: dstreza@vmbllp.com
Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union,
LLC
25
26
27
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest
that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from each of
the Signatories.
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:17-CV-00394-JST
Page 2 of 3
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Trans Union, LLC is
2
dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff and Defendant Trans Union, LLC shall each bear their own
3
costs and attorneys’ fees.
4
5
6
April 27, 2017
Date: ________________________
7
____________________________________
JUDGE, United States District Court, Northern
District of California
8
9
DISTRIBUTION TO:
10
11
12
13
14
15
Elliot Wayne Gale, Esq.
egale@sagarialaw.com
Scott Joseph Sagaria, Esq.
sjsagaria@sagarialaw.com
David J. Streza, Esq.
dstreza@vmbllp.com
Christopher A. Ferguson, Esq.
cferguson@schuckitlaw.com
Scott Matthew Johnson, Esq.
sjohnson@sagarialaw.com
Joseph B. Angelo, Esq.
jangelo@sagarialaw.com
Amir Q. Amiri, Esq.
aamiri@jonesday.com
Taylor Robert Steinbacher, Esq.
steinbachert@ballardspahr.com
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:17-CV-00394-JST
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?