Dytch v. Peet's Operating Company, Inc. et al

Filing 12

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice, with leave to reinstate on or before 6/15/2017 for the purpose of proceeding with the litigation in the event a settlement has not been completed prior to that date. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 4/27/2017. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ALBERT DYTCH, Case No. 17-cv-00410-EDL Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 PEET'S OPERATING COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants. The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a 13 settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice, 14 with leave to reinstate on or before June 15, 2017 for the purpose of proceeding with the litigation 15 in the event a settlement has not been completed prior to that date. In the event a request to 16 reinstate the case is not filed and served on opposing counsel on or before the foregoing date, the 17 dismissal will be with prejudice. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 27, 2017 ______________________________________ ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?