Rose v. Equifax, Inc. et al
ORDER RE: STIPULATIONS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 02/23/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2017)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EQUIFAX, INC., et al.,
Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 19
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER RE: STIPULATIONS
Case No. 17-cv-00419-MMC
On February 16, 2017, and February 17, 2017, respectively, plaintiff Lacy Rose
entered stipulations with defendants Equifax, Inc. and TD Bank, USA National
Association (“Stipulating Defendants”), by which the parties agreed to extend the time for
Stipulating Defendants’ responses to plaintiff’s complaint and also, in the event such
response is a motion to dismiss, to expand the briefing schedule thereon.
To the extent the parties have agreed upon an extension of time to respond to
plaintiff’s complaint, such stipulation is effective “without a Court order.” See Civil L.R. 6-
To the extent the parties wish to alter the briefing schedule, however, the parties
are hereby advised that they will need to obtain court approval. See Civil L.R. 6-1(b)
(providing “[a] Court order is required” for “any enlargement or shortening of time that
alters an event or deadline . . . that involves papers required to be filed or lodged with the
Court (other than an initial response to the complaint)”).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 23, 2017
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?