Rose v. Equifax, Inc. et al
Filing
37
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT FIRST DATA MERCHANT SERVICES, LLC TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 04/10/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2017)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
LACY ROSE,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
v.
EQUIFAX, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 17-cv-00419-MMC
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT
FIRST DATA MERCHANT SERVICES,
LLC TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY
OF DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE
WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND
COURT'S STANDING ORDERS
12
13
On March 27, 2017, defendant First Data Merchant Services, LLC ("First Data")
14
electronically filed its "Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint." First
15
Data has violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court's Standing Orders,
16
however, by failing "to provide for chambers a paper copy of each document that is
17
electronically filed . . . marked 'Chambers Copy'." See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also
18
Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ΒΆ 2.
19
First Data is hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the
20
Court's Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-
21
referenced document. First Data is hereby advised that if it fails in the future to comply
22
with the Court's Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically filed
23
document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the
24
record any electronically filed document for which a chambers copy has not been timely
25
provided to the Court.
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 10, 2017
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?