Rose v. Equifax, Inc. et al

Filing 39

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TD BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 04/13/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2017)

Download PDF
H ER 6 R NIA ey sn M. Che LI RT axine Judge M A Attorneys for Defendant TD Bank USA, National Association 3 FO S UNIT ED 5 2 VED APPRO NO 4 Renee Choy Ohlendorf (SBN 263939) rchoy@hinshawlaw.com HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP One California Street, 18th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-362-6000 Facsimile: 415-834-9070 RT U O 1 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C Date: April 13, 2017 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 Lacy Rose, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 3:17-cv-00419-MMC STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TD BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT vs. Equifax, Inc.; TransUnion, LLC; Avant, Inc.; First Data Merchant Services, LLC; TD Bank USA, National Association and Does 1 through 100, Complaint Filed: January 26, 2017 16 Defendants. 17 18 Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(a) and 6-2, Defendant TD Bank USA, National Association 19 ("TD Bank") and Plaintiff Lacy Rose ("Plaintiff"), by and through their undersigned counsel of 20 record, stipulate and agree as follows: 21 WHEREAS, on January 26, 2017, Plaintiff filed her initial complaint [Dkt. 1]; 22 WHEREAS, TD Bank filed a Motion to Dismiss the Initial Complaint on March 17, 2017 23 [Dkt. 28]; 24 WHEREAS, on April 7, 2017, Plaintiff filed and served an Amended Complaint [Dkt. 35]. 25 Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 15(a)(3), TD Bank is to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended 26 Complaint on or before April 21, 2017; 27 WHEREAS, to permit TD Bank sufficient time to evaluate the claims in the Amended 28 Complaint and prepare an appropriate responsive pleading or motion, and for the parties to discuss a 1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TD BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT 3562218v1 0995287 1 potential early resolution of the case, the parties have agreed to a forty-five day extension for TD 2 Bank to answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint up to and including June 5, 2017. 3 The parties have been in the process of exchanging informal discovery. This extension will not 4 affect any pending court dates or deadlines, nor will it prejudice any party herein. The Initial Case 5 Management Conference is set for hearing on June 16, 2017, with the Joint Case Management 6 Statement to be filed on or before June 9, 2017. 7 8 IT IS STIPULATED THAT TD Bank shall have up to and including June 5, 2017 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. 9 10 11 Dated: April 11, 2017 12 By: /s/ Renee Choy Ohlendorf Renee Choy Ohlendorf Attorneys for Defendant TD Bank USA, National Association 13 14 15 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP Dated: April 11, 2017 16 SAGARIA LAW, P.C. By: _/s/ Elliot Wayne Gale__________________ Elliot Wayne Gale Attorneys for Plaintiff Lacy Rose 17 18 FILER ATTESTATION 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Pursuant to Rule 5-1(i)(3) of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings Before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, I, Renee Choy Ohlendorf, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. 26 27 s/Renee Choy Ohlendorf 28 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TD BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT 3562218v1 0995287

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?