Rose v. Equifax, Inc. et al
Filing
39
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TD BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 04/13/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2017)
H
ER
6
R NIA
ey
sn
M. Che
LI
RT
axine
Judge M
A
Attorneys for Defendant TD Bank USA, National Association
3
FO
S
UNIT
ED
5
2
VED
APPRO
NO
4
Renee Choy Ohlendorf (SBN 263939)
rchoy@hinshawlaw.com
HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP
One California Street, 18th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
415-362-6000
Facsimile:
415-834-9070
RT
U
O
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Date: April 13, 2017
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
Lacy Rose,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 3:17-cv-00419-MMC
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TD BANK USA, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT
vs.
Equifax, Inc.; TransUnion, LLC; Avant, Inc.;
First Data Merchant Services, LLC; TD Bank
USA, National Association and Does 1 through
100,
Complaint Filed: January 26, 2017
16
Defendants.
17
18
Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(a) and 6-2, Defendant TD Bank USA, National Association
19
("TD Bank") and Plaintiff Lacy Rose ("Plaintiff"), by and through their undersigned counsel of
20
record, stipulate and agree as follows:
21
WHEREAS, on January 26, 2017, Plaintiff filed her initial complaint [Dkt. 1];
22
WHEREAS, TD Bank filed a Motion to Dismiss the Initial Complaint on March 17, 2017
23
[Dkt. 28];
24
WHEREAS, on April 7, 2017, Plaintiff filed and served an Amended Complaint [Dkt. 35].
25
Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 15(a)(3), TD Bank is to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended
26
Complaint on or before April 21, 2017;
27
WHEREAS, to permit TD Bank sufficient time to evaluate the claims in the Amended
28
Complaint and prepare an appropriate responsive pleading or motion, and for the parties to discuss a
1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TD BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION TO
RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
3562218v1 0995287
1
potential early resolution of the case, the parties have agreed to a forty-five day extension for TD
2
Bank to answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint up to and including June 5, 2017.
3
The parties have been in the process of exchanging informal discovery. This extension will not
4
affect any pending court dates or deadlines, nor will it prejudice any party herein. The Initial Case
5
Management Conference is set for hearing on June 16, 2017, with the Joint Case Management
6
Statement to be filed on or before June 9, 2017.
7
8
IT IS STIPULATED THAT TD Bank shall have up to and including June 5, 2017 to
answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint.
9
10
11
Dated: April 11, 2017
12
By: /s/ Renee Choy Ohlendorf
Renee Choy Ohlendorf
Attorneys for Defendant TD Bank USA,
National Association
13
14
15
HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP
Dated: April 11, 2017
16
SAGARIA LAW, P.C.
By: _/s/ Elliot Wayne Gale__________________
Elliot Wayne Gale
Attorneys for Plaintiff Lacy Rose
17
18
FILER ATTESTATION
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Pursuant to Rule 5-1(i)(3) of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings Before the
United States District Court for the Northern District of California, I, Renee Choy Ohlendorf, hereby
attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other
signatories.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and the United
States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.
26
27
s/Renee Choy Ohlendorf
28
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TD BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION TO
RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
3562218v1 0995287
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?