Dytch v. Magana et al
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE 25 . (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 7/31/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 17-cv-00438-SI
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
ANTONIO MAGANA, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 25
Plaintiff Albert Dytch filed a motion to strike defendant Maxaco, LLC’s (“Maxaco’s”)
answer, Dkt. No. 13, because Maxaco improperly appeared pro se and needs to be represented by
counsel. See Mot. to Strike (Dkt. No. 25) at 2 (citing Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, 506
U.S. 194, 196 (1993)). Maxaco has not filed a response to plaintiff’s motion, nor has it retained
counsel to represent it in this action.
Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to strike is GRANTED. Maxaco is hereby ORDERED to
appear through counsel within two weeks of the date of this order. If no appearance
through counsel is filed, defendant Maxaco may be found in default.
This order resolves Dkt. No. 25.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 31, 2017
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?