Dytch v. Magana et al

Filing 26

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE 25 . (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 7/31/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ALBERT DYTCH, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 17-cv-00438-SI ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE v. ANTONIO MAGANA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 25 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Albert Dytch filed a motion to strike defendant Maxaco, LLC’s (“Maxaco’s”) 13 answer, Dkt. No. 13, because Maxaco improperly appeared pro se and needs to be represented by 14 counsel. See Mot. to Strike (Dkt. No. 25) at 2 (citing Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, 506 15 U.S. 194, 196 (1993)). Maxaco has not filed a response to plaintiff’s motion, nor has it retained 16 counsel to represent it in this action. 17 Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to strike is GRANTED. Maxaco is hereby ORDERED to 18 appear through counsel within two weeks of the date of this order. If no appearance 19 through counsel is filed, defendant Maxaco may be found in default. 20 21 This order resolves Dkt. No. 25. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: July 31, 2017 ______________________________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?