Dytch v. Magana et al

Filing 26

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE 25 . (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 7/31/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

ALBERT DYTCH,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 17-cv-00438-SI
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
STRIKE

v.
ANTONIO MAGANA, et al.,

Re: Dkt. No. 25

Defendants.

12

Plaintiff Albert Dytch filed a motion to strike defendant Maxaco, LLC’s (“Maxaco’s”)

13

answer, Dkt. No. 13, because Maxaco improperly appeared pro se and needs to be represented by

14

counsel. See Mot. to Strike (Dkt. No. 25) at 2 (citing Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, 506

15

U.S. 194, 196 (1993)). Maxaco has not filed a response to plaintiff’s motion, nor has it retained

16

counsel to represent it in this action.

17

Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to strike is GRANTED. Maxaco is hereby ORDERED to

18

appear through counsel within two weeks of the date of this order. If no appearance

19

through counsel is filed, defendant Maxaco may be found in default.

20
21

This order resolves Dkt. No. 25.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: July 31, 2017
______________________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge