Williams v. Dahl

Filing 5

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 5/30/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2017)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

WILLIE WILLIAMS, AE8191,
Plaintiff(s),

8
9
10
11

vs.
M. DAHL, Correctional Counselor,
Defendant(s).

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. C 17-0461 CRB (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

12
13

Per order filed on April 24, 2017, the court dismissed with leave to amend

14

plaintiff’s pro se prisoner complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to allege, if possible,

15

facts showing that defendant: (1) knew that plaintiff faced a substantial risk of

16

serious harm and disregarded that risk by failing to take reasonable steps to abate

17

it, and (2) actually and proximately caused the deprivation of plaintiff’s Eighth

18

Amendment rights. The court made clear that failure to file a proper amended

19

complaint within 28 days will result in the dismissal of this action.

20

More than 28 days have passed, but plaintiff has neither filed a proper

21

amended complaint nor sought an extension of time to do so. This action

22

accordingly is DISMISSED.

23

SO ORDERED.

24

DATED: May 30, 2017

25

CHARLES R. BREYER
United States District Judge

26
27
28

G:\PRO-SE\CRB\CR.17\Williams, W.17-0461.dismissal.wpd