French v. CEC Entertainment, Inc.
Filing
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 24 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by CEC Entertainment, Inc. and Plaintiff Kevin French filed by CEC Entertainment, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 27, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2017)
Reset Form
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Kevin French, et al.
CASE No C 3:17-cv-00479-JST
Plaintiff(s)
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
CEC Entertainment, Inc., et al.
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
s
Private ADR (specify process and provider)
Private mediation. The parties are meeting and
conferring to select an agreeable mediator.
Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered. )
other requested deadline: within 120 days.
s
Date: June 19, 2017
Date: June 19, 2017
/s/ Michael Malk
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Paul Mata
Attorney for Defendant
IT IS SO ORDERED
X
IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
Date: July 27, 2017
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Private ADR.”
Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017
Print Form
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?