Bennett v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 17

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Judge Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

IN RE EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS CREDIT REPORTING
LITIGATION

No. C 16-05674 WHA
No. C 16-05676 WHA
No. C 16-05679 WHA
No. C 16-05694 WHA
No. C 16-05701 WHA
No. C 16-05704 WHA
No. C 16-06315 WHA
No. C 16-06335 WHA
No. C 16-06363 WHA
No. C 16-06372 WHA
No. C 17-00342 WHA
No. C 17-00343 WHA
No. C 17-00395 WHA
No. C 17-00397 WHA
No. C 17-00506 WHA

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

/

1

In ten of the above-captioned cases, a combined motion to dismiss is scheduled for

2

hearing on March 23. This particular action, Bennett v. Experian, 3:17-cv-00506-WHA, is not a

3

part of that combined motion. Defendants in this action, however, shall have until 28 DAYS

4

after the Court rules on the aforementioned combined motion to answer or otherwise respond to

5

the complaint. The pending stipulated requests to extend the time for defendants Experian

6

Information Solutions, Inc., and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., to respond to the complaint (Dkt.

7

Nos. 14, 16) are DENIED as inconsistent with this order.

8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
Dated: March 20, 2017.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2