Otero v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Filing
44
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 42 for dismissal of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. filed by Earlene Otero. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/26/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2017)
6
Scott J. Sagaria (SBN 217981)
SJSagaria@sagarialaw.com
Elliot W. Gale (SBN 263326)
EGale@sagarialaw.com
Joe Angelo (SBN 268542)
JAngelo@sagarialaw.com
SAGARIA LAW, P.C.
3017 Douglas Blvd., Ste 100
Roseville, CA 95661
Telephone: (408) 279-2288
Facsimile: (408) 297-2299
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff Earlene Otero
1
2
3
4
5
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
EARLENE OTERO,
Case No.: 3:17-cv-00508-EMC
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
15
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK,
N.A.; [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC., ET AL.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:
20
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Earlene Otero and defendant
21
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. that Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. be dismissed from this action with
22
prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2), and that each party shall
23
bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; [PROPOSED] ORDER -1-
1
DATED: September 20, 2017
Sagaria Law, P.C.
By:
/s/ Elliot Gale
Elliot Gale
Attorney for Plaintiff Rudolph Jugoz
2
3
4
5
DATED: September 20, 2017
6
Severson & Werson, APC
By:
/s/ Alisa Alexandra Givental
Alisa Alexandra Givental
Attorney for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A.
7
8
9
10
11
I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this
Stipulation. I hereby attest that Alisa Alexandra Givental has concurred in this filing.
12
13
/s/ Elliot Gale
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT
ED
22
26
n
M. Che
Edward
Hon.Judge
Edward M. Chen
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ER
H
25
9/26/17
RT
24
DATED:
NO
23
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
FO
21
RT
U
O
20
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
R NIA
prejudice.
LI
19
A
18
Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is dismissed with
S
17
[PROPOSED] ORDER
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; [PROPOSED] ORDER -2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?