Otero v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 44

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 42 for dismissal of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. filed by Earlene Otero. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/26/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2017)

Download PDF
6 Scott J. Sagaria (SBN 217981) SJSagaria@sagarialaw.com Elliot W. Gale (SBN 263326) EGale@sagarialaw.com Joe Angelo (SBN 268542) JAngelo@sagarialaw.com SAGARIA LAW, P.C. 3017 Douglas Blvd., Ste 100 Roseville, CA 95661 Telephone: (408) 279-2288 Facsimile: (408) 297-2299 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff Earlene Otero 1 2 3 4 5 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EARLENE OTERO, Case No.: 3:17-cv-00508-EMC 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 15 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; [PROPOSED] ORDER EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES: 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Earlene Otero and defendant 21 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. that Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. be dismissed from this action with 22 prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2), and that each party shall 23 bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; [PROPOSED] ORDER -1- 1 DATED: September 20, 2017 Sagaria Law, P.C. By: /s/ Elliot Gale Elliot Gale Attorney for Plaintiff Rudolph Jugoz 2 3 4 5 DATED: September 20, 2017 6 Severson & Werson, APC By: /s/ Alisa Alexandra Givental Alisa Alexandra Givental Attorney for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 7 8 9 10 11 I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation. I hereby attest that Alisa Alexandra Givental has concurred in this filing. 12 13 /s/ Elliot Gale 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 22 26 n M. Che Edward Hon.Judge Edward M. Chen UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ER H 25 9/26/17 RT 24 DATED: NO 23 D RDERE OO IT IS S FO 21 RT U O 20 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA prejudice. LI 19 A 18 Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is dismissed with S 17 [PROPOSED] ORDER N F D IS T IC T O R C 27 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; [PROPOSED] ORDER -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?