Johnson v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al

Filing 66

ORDER granting 65 STIPULATION To Reschedule Argument on 59 MOTION to Dismiss. Motion Hearing reset for 1/31/2018 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Judge William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/20/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Crystal Foley (SBN 224627)
SIMMONS HANLY CONROY LLC
100 N. Sepulveda Boulevard, Suite 1350
Los Angeles, California 90245
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 310.322.3655
[e-mail]
Paul J. Hanly, Jr. (admitted pro hac vice)
Mitchell M. Breit (admitted pro hac vice)
SIMMONS HANLY CONROY LLC
112 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10016
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 212.213.5949
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SHERIDA JOHNSON, HARRY GUNSENHOUSER,
and SUBRINA SEENARAIN
Amir M. Nassihi (SBN 235936)
Andrew L. Chang (SBN 222309)
SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.
One Montgomery, Suite 2700
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.391.0281
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20
21
22

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
SHERIDA JOHNSON, et al.,,
Plaintiffs,

23
24
25

v.
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

Case No. 3:17-cv-00517-WHO
STIPULATION AND
ORDER TO RESCHEDULE
ARGUMENT ON MOTION TO
DISMISS

Defendant.

26
27
28
376621 v1

STIPULATION AND ORDER
CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00517-WHO

1

Pursuant to paragraph 1(d) of the Honorable William H. Orrick’s Case Management

2

Conference Order (Dkt. 20) and L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiffs Sherida Johnson, Harry

3

Gunsenhouser, and Subrina Seenarain (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Nissan North America (“NNA”)

4

(collectively, the “Parties”) enter into this stipulation with reference to the following facts and

5

recitals:

6
7

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) on September 18,
2017 (Dkt. 56);

8

WHEREAS, NNA filed its Motion to Dismiss the SAC on October 23, 2017 (Dkt.59);

9

WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed their opposition to the Motion to Dismiss on November 13, 2017

10
11
12

(Dkt 62) and NNA’s filed its reply be filed on November 29, 2017 (Dkt 64);
WHEREAS, the Court entered an order scheduling argument on the Motion to Dismiss on
January 3, 2018 (Dkt 61); and

13

WHEREAS, one of Plaintiffs’ lead counsel will be out of the country on that date on a long-

14

standing, previously scheduled holiday vacation and respectfully requests that argument be

15

rescheduled to January 31, 2018;

16
17
18
19

Plaintiffs and NNA stipulate and agree as follows and request the Court enter an Order as
follows:
1.

Argument on NNA’s Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint shall be

held on January 31, 2018;

20

2.

The requested modification will not impact the current case schedule

21

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: December 7, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
SIMMONS HANLY CONROY LLC
By: ____/s/ Mitchell M. Breit_______________
MITCHELL M. BREIT
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00517-WHO

1

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

2

SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.

3

By: __/s/ Amir M. Nassihi_________________
AMIR M. NASSIHI
ANDREW L. CHANG

4
5

Attorneys for Defendant
Nissan North America, Inc.

6
7

Dated: December 7, 2017

8

Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained

9

from the other signatories.

10

By:

11

/s/ Mitchell M. Breit
Mitchell M. Breit

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER
CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00517-WHO

ORDER

1
2

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court hereby orders as follows:

3

1. Argument on NNA’s Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint will be held

4

on January 31, 2018;

5
6
7
8

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
December 20, 2017
Dated: ___________________

__________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3

STIPULATION AND ORDER
CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00517-WHO