Ariza v. Skinner

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT; GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 9, 2017. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/9/2017: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 EFRAIN ARIZA, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 v. MARTHA SUE SKINNER, Case No. 17-cv-00546-MMC ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT; GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Defendant. 12 13 Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation, filed February 16, 2017, in 14 which Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu recommends that the Court remand the above- 15 titled action to state court, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. No party has filed an 16 objection or other response to the Report and Recommendation. Having read and 17 considered the Report and Recommendation, and having considered the matter de novo, 18 the Court rules as follows: 19 20 21 1. As it appears defendant lacks the financial resources to pay the filing fee, defendant's application to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby GRANTED. 2. For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds it 22 lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the complaint, and, accordingly, the above-titled 23 action is hereby REMANDED to the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for 24 the County of Marin. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: March 9, 2017 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?