Synopsys, Inc. v. Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. et al
Filing
83
STIPULATION AND ORDER extending deadline to file reply to 77 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Counterclaims. Reply due by 10/13/2017. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/10/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
DENISE M. MINGRONE (SBN 135224)
dmingrone@orrick.com
ROBERT L. URIARTE (SBN 258274)
ruriarte@orrick.com
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, California 94025-1015
Telephone:
650.614.7400
Facsimile:
650.614.7401
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC.
7
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (SBN 161368)
JTaylor@mofo.com
STACEY M. SPRENKEL (SBN 241689)
SSprenkel@mofo.com
JOYCE LIOU (SBN 277720)
JLiou@mofo.com
AMANDA D. PHILLIPS (SBN 305614)
APhillips@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: 415.268.7000
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
Attorneys for Defendants
UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC., UBIQUITI
NETWORKS INTERNATIONAL
LIMITED, and CHING-HAN TSAI
8
9
10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
SYNOPSYS, INC.,
14
15
16
17
Case No. 3:17-cv-00561 -WHO
Plaintiff,
v.
UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC., UBIQUITI
NETWORKS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, and
CHING-HAN TSAI,
18
JOINT STIPULATION AND
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO
FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS
CIVIL L.R. 6-1
Defendants.
19
20
UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. and UBIQUITI
NETWORKS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,
21
22
23
24
Counterclaimants,
v.
SYNOPSYS, INC.,
Counterdefendant.
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:17-CV-00561 (WHO)
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS
sf-3830478
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), it is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff
2
Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys”) and Defendant Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. (“Ubiquiti”), through
3
respective counsel, as follows:
1.
4
On September 19, 2017, Ubiquiti filed its Motion for Leave to file Amended
5
Counterclaims, requesting a hearing before the Court on November 1, 2017 (Dkt. No. 77), and on
6
October 3, 2017, Synopsys filed its brief in opposition (Dk. No. 78).
2.
7
8
Ubiquiti’s motion to November 8, 2017.
3.
9
10
On October 4, 2017, the Court issued a notice resetting the hearing date for
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(c), Ubiquiti’s deadline to file a reply brief in support of
its motion is October 10, 2017.
4.
11
Due to evacuations from the fires in Napa and Sonoma Counties, members of the
12
case team at Ubiquiti’s outside counsel are unavailable to finalize the reply brief on October 10,
13
2017.
14
5.
Because of ongoing uncertainty as to fire evacuations, Counsel for Synopsys and
15
Ubiquiti agree that it is appropriate to extend Ubiquiti’s last day to file a reply brief in support of
16
its motion from October 10, 2017 to October 13, 2017.
17
6.
The Parties have made the following prior requests for extensions in this case.
18
7.
On February 22, 2017, the Parties filed a Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to
19
20
Respond to Complaint, extending the deadline to March 7, 2017.
8.
On August 25, 2017, the Parties filed a Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to
21
Respond to Amended Complaint, extending that deadline from September 4, 2017 to fourteen
22
(14) days from the date that Plaintiff filed a further amended complaint, or fourteen (14) days
23
from September 4, whichever date is earlier.
24
9.
On September 11, 2017, recognizing that due to the Labor Day holiday the parties
25
had misidentified Plaintiff’s last day to file a further amended complaint as September 4, 2017,
26
and because Plaintiff filed a further amended complaint on September 5, 2017, the Parties filed a
27
Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Amended Complaint from September 18, 2017 to
28
September 19, 2017.
Case No. 3:17-CV-00561 (WHO)
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS
sf-3830478
1
2
Dated: October 10, 2017
3
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR
JOYCE LIOU
AMANDA D. PHILLIPS
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
4
By:
5
6
/s/ Jennifer Lee Taylor1
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR
Attorneys for Defendant
UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC.
7
8
9
Dated: October 10, 2017
10
DENISE M. MINGRONE
ROBERT L. URIARTE
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SULTCLIFFE
LLP
11
By:
12
13
/s/ Denise M. Mingrone
DENISE M. MINGRONE
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC.
14
15
16
ORDER
17
18
19
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, Ubiquiti’s deadline to file a reply in support of its
motion for leave to file amended counterclaims is October 13, 2017.
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
Dated: October 10, 2017
24
_____________________________
Hon. William H. Orrick
U.S. District Judge
25
26
27
28
1
In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the
filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories hereto.
Case No. 3:17-CV-00561 (WHO)
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS
sf-3830478
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?