Synopsys, Inc. v. Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 83

STIPULATION AND ORDER extending deadline to file reply to 77 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Counterclaims. Reply due by 10/13/2017. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/10/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 DENISE M. MINGRONE (SBN 135224) dmingrone@orrick.com ROBERT L. URIARTE (SBN 258274) ruriarte@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, California 94025-1015 Telephone: 650.614.7400 Facsimile: 650.614.7401 Attorneys for Plaintiff SYNOPSYS, INC. 7 JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (SBN 161368) JTaylor@mofo.com STACEY M. SPRENKEL (SBN 241689) SSprenkel@mofo.com JOYCE LIOU (SBN 277720) JLiou@mofo.com AMANDA D. PHILLIPS (SBN 305614) APhillips@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Defendants UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC., UBIQUITI NETWORKS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, and CHING-HAN TSAI 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 SYNOPSYS, INC., 14 15 16 17 Case No. 3:17-cv-00561 -WHO Plaintiff, v. UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC., UBIQUITI NETWORKS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, and CHING-HAN TSAI, 18 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS CIVIL L.R. 6-1 Defendants. 19 20 UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. and UBIQUITI NETWORKS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, 21 22 23 24 Counterclaimants, v. SYNOPSYS, INC., Counterdefendant. 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:17-CV-00561 (WHO) JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS sf-3830478 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), it is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff 2 Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys”) and Defendant Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. (“Ubiquiti”), through 3 respective counsel, as follows: 1. 4 On September 19, 2017, Ubiquiti filed its Motion for Leave to file Amended 5 Counterclaims, requesting a hearing before the Court on November 1, 2017 (Dkt. No. 77), and on 6 October 3, 2017, Synopsys filed its brief in opposition (Dk. No. 78). 2. 7 8 Ubiquiti’s motion to November 8, 2017. 3. 9 10 On October 4, 2017, the Court issued a notice resetting the hearing date for Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(c), Ubiquiti’s deadline to file a reply brief in support of its motion is October 10, 2017. 4. 11 Due to evacuations from the fires in Napa and Sonoma Counties, members of the 12 case team at Ubiquiti’s outside counsel are unavailable to finalize the reply brief on October 10, 13 2017. 14 5. Because of ongoing uncertainty as to fire evacuations, Counsel for Synopsys and 15 Ubiquiti agree that it is appropriate to extend Ubiquiti’s last day to file a reply brief in support of 16 its motion from October 10, 2017 to October 13, 2017. 17 6. The Parties have made the following prior requests for extensions in this case. 18 7. On February 22, 2017, the Parties filed a Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to 19 20 Respond to Complaint, extending the deadline to March 7, 2017. 8. On August 25, 2017, the Parties filed a Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to 21 Respond to Amended Complaint, extending that deadline from September 4, 2017 to fourteen 22 (14) days from the date that Plaintiff filed a further amended complaint, or fourteen (14) days 23 from September 4, whichever date is earlier. 24 9. On September 11, 2017, recognizing that due to the Labor Day holiday the parties 25 had misidentified Plaintiff’s last day to file a further amended complaint as September 4, 2017, 26 and because Plaintiff filed a further amended complaint on September 5, 2017, the Parties filed a 27 Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Amended Complaint from September 18, 2017 to 28 September 19, 2017. Case No. 3:17-CV-00561 (WHO) JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS sf-3830478 1 2 Dated: October 10, 2017 3 JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR JOYCE LIOU AMANDA D. PHILLIPS MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 4 By: 5 6 /s/ Jennifer Lee Taylor1 JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR Attorneys for Defendant UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. 7 8 9 Dated: October 10, 2017 10 DENISE M. MINGRONE ROBERT L. URIARTE ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SULTCLIFFE LLP 11 By: 12 13 /s/ Denise M. Mingrone DENISE M. MINGRONE Attorneys for Plaintiff SYNOPSYS, INC. 14 15 16 ORDER 17 18 19 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, Ubiquiti’s deadline to file a reply in support of its motion for leave to file amended counterclaims is October 13, 2017. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 Dated: October 10, 2017 24 _____________________________ Hon. William H. Orrick U.S. District Judge 25 26 27 28 1 In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories hereto. Case No. 3:17-CV-00561 (WHO) JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS sf-3830478

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?