Espinoza v. Colvin

Filing 15

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 14 Extending Plaintiff's Time to File Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/5/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2017)

Case 3:17-cv-00577-RS Document 14 Filed 07/03/17 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5

David J. Linden
Attorney at Law
CSBN 41221
Post Office Box 5780
Napa, CA 94581
Tel. [phone]
Fax. [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff, Ignacio Moreno Espinoza

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

10
11

IGNACIO MORENO ESPINOZA,
Plaintiff,

12

vs.

13
14
15

NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

16

Defendant

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:17-cv-00577-RS
STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER
EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO FILE
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT

17
18
19

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective

20

counsel, and subject to the approval of the Court, that the plaintiff’s time to file his Motion for

21

Summary Judgment herein is hereby extended for a period of 42 days. Plaintiff’s Motion is due

22

Monday, July 10. This request, if approved, would extend the filing date to Monday, August 21.

23

//

24

//

25

Espinoza v. Berryhill, Case 3:17-cv-00577-RS, Stipulation and Order Extending
Plaintiff’s Time to File Summary Judgment Motion - 1

Case 3:17-cv-00577-RS Document 14 Filed 07/03/17 Page 2 of 2

This extension is requested because of a vacation and workload on other court matters

1
2

affecting the schedule of plaintiff's lead attorney and of attorney Ralph Wilborn, who is assisting

3

plaintiff's lead attorney in this matter. This is plaintiff's first request for an extension of time.

4
5
6

Dated: ___July 3, 2017__

7

/s/ David J. Linden
DAVID J. LINDEN
Attorney at Law
Attorney for Plaintiff

8

BRIAN STRETCH
United States Attorney

9
10
11
12

Dated:

July 3, 2017

13
14

/s/ C. Hay-Mie Cho
[Authorized via electronic mail 07/03/2017]
C. HAY-MIE CHO
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Of Attorneys for Defendant

15
16
17

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
19
20
21
22

Dated: 7/5/17
HON. RICHARD SEEBORG,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

23
24
25

Espinoza v. Berryhill, Case 3:17-cv-00577-RS, Stipulation and Order Extending
Plaintiff’s Time to File Summary Judgment Motion - 2