Automotive Industries Pension Trust Fund et al v. Mike Rose's Auto Body, Inc. et al
Filing
39
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 37 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER AND JOINT REQUEST TO FURTHER MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DATES filed by Mike Rose's Auto Body, Inc. Fact discovery cut-off 4/30/2018. Expert disclosures 5/14/2018. Expert rebuttal 5/28/2018. Expert discovery cutoff 6/8/2018. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 12, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2018)
1 Anne M. Bevington, Esq. (SBN 111320)
Kimberly A. Hancock, Esq. (SBN 205567)
2 Matthew P. Minser, Esq. (SBN 296344)
SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION
3 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110
San Francisco, CA 94104
4 (415) 882-7900
(415) 882-9287 – Facsimile
5 abevington@sjlawcorp.com
khancock@sjlawcorp.com
6 mminser@sjlawcorp.com
7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Automotive Industries
Pension Trust Fund, et al.
8
Robert F. Schwartz, No. 227327
9 Clarissa A. Kang, No. 210660
Jahiz Noel Agard, No. 282988
10 TRUCKER HUSS
A Professional Corporation
11 One Embarcadero Center, 12th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
(415) 788-3111
12 Telephone:
Facsimile:
(415) 421-2017
rschwartz@truckerhuss.com
13 E-mail:
ckang@truckerhuss.com
jagard@truckerhuss.com
14
15 Attorneys for Defendants
Mike Rose’s Auto Body, Inc., et al.
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)
20 AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES PENSION
TRUST FUND, et al.,
21
Plaintiffs,
22 v.
Case No.: Case No. 17-cv-00602 JST
STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST
TO FURTHER MODIFY SCHEDULING
ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY CUTOFF DATES; AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
23 MIKE ROSE’S AUTO BODY INC., a
California corporation, et al.
24
Defendants.
25
26
27
Complaint Filed: February 6, 2017
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, by and through
their attorneys of record, and the parties jointly request that the Court modify its Scheduling
28
-1STIP. AND JOINT REQUEST TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND
DISCOVERY CUT-OFF; [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00602 JST
173641.v1
1 Order, initially issued June 21, 2017 (Doc. No. 26) and modified on February 14, 2018 (Doc. No.
2 36), as follows:
3
Event
Scheduled Date
Requested Date
Previous Extension
5
Fact discovery cut-off
Mar. 30, 2018
April 30, 2018
1
6
Expert disclosures
Apr. 23, 2018
May 14, 2018
1
Expert rebuttal
May 15, 2018
May 28, 2018
1
Expert discovery cutoff
June 1, 2018
June 8, 2018
1
Deadline to file dispositive
motions
Jun. 21, 2018
No change
None
Sept. 25, 2018
No change
None
12
Pretrial conference statement
due
13
Pretrial conference
Oct. 5, 2018
2:00 p.m.
No change
None
Trial
Oct. 29, 2018
8:30 a.m.
No change
None
4
7
8
9
10
11
14
15
16
17
The parties submit that good cause exists for the following reasons.
18
1.
The Scheduling Order was initially issued on June 21, 2017, and modified pursuant
19
to the parties’ joint request on February 14, 2018. The currently requested extensions are for
20
discovery cut-off dates only and do not delay the dates for filing dispositive motions, or for the
21
pretrial conference and trial.
2.
22
23
The parties are actively engaged in settlement negotiations and wish to attempt a
resolution of this matter before incurring further expense of discovery.
3.
24
The parties have propounded written discovery and have conferred regarding the
25
setting of depositions. The parties have agreed on the following discovery plan, subject to the
26
Court’s granting their joint request to modify the schedule:
•
27
28
April 3, 2018 – Defendant’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Written Discovery due.
-2-
STIP. AND JOINT REQUEST TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND
DISCOVERY CUT-OFF; [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00602 JST
173641.v1
1
•
April 15, 2018 – Plaintiff’s Responses to Defendants’ Written Discovery due.
2
•
Depositions may be conducted at any time pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure and the Civil Local Rules, or by mutual agreement.
3
7.
4
The parties respectfully request that the Court approve this stipulation and
5 incorporate its terms in an Order.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
6
7
SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION
8 DATED: March 9, 2018
By: /S/_Anne M. Bevington____
Anne M. Bevington
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
9
10
TRUCKER HUSS
11
12 DATED: March 9, 2018
13
14
By: /S/ Robert F. Schwartz
Robert F. Schwartz
Attorneys for Defendants
CERTIFICATION RE SIGNATURES
15
I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Anne M.
16 Bevington.
17 Dated: March 9, 2018
/s/ Robert F. Schwartz
Robert F. Schwartz
18
19 IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court is unlikely to grant any further requests for continuance.
20
March 12
Dated: ____________, 2018
21
HON. JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIP. AND JOINT REQUEST TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND
DISCOVERY CUT-OFF; [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00602 JST
173641.v1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?