Kirlin Builders, LLC v. North American Specialty Insurance Company

Filing 71

AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 13, 2019. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KIRLIN BUILDERS, LLC, Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 17-cv-00608-JST Defendant. AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING DEFAULT JUDGMENT Re: ECF Nos. 53, 66 12 13 The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Kandis Westmore’s report and recommendation, 14 ECF No. 66, to grant Defendant/Cross-Claimant North American Specialty Co.’s (“NAS”) motion 15 for default judgment against Cross-Defendants Selina Singh, Majindar Singh, Bara Infoware, Inc., 16 and Federal Solutions Group, Inc. ECF No. 25. NAS served Cross-Defendants with the report on 17 June 7, 2019. ECF No. 67. The period for objections has elapsed, and no objections were filed. 18 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The Court finds the report correct, well-reasoned, and thorough, and adopts it in every 19 20 respect. The defaulting cross-defendants have never appeared in the case, and NAS’s motion for 21 default judgment in the form of damages is supported by the record. In particular, the Court 22 concurs in Judge Westmore’s assessment of the factors enumerated by the Ninth Circuit in Eitel v. 23 McCool, 782 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1986). See ECF No. 66 at 6-9. The Court also agrees that an 24 award of $3.5 million, plus prejudgment interest at an annual rate of 10 percent and post-judgment 25 interest calculated according to 28 U.S.C. § 1961, is warranted here. Id. at 9-11. 26 \\\ 27 \\\ 28 \\\ 1 Accordingly, the Court will enter judgment in those amounts in a separate document. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 5 Dated: August 13, 2019 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?