Lagree Technologies, Inc. et al v. Spartacus 20th L.P. et al

Filing 136

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENSE COUNSEL SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR AT THE FURTHER TELEPHONIC SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Show Cause Response due by 11/22/2017.Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on November 21, 2017. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
LAGREE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

At the parties’ request, the court scheduled a follow-up settlement call for November 16,
2017. Plaintiff’s counsel appeared for the call; defense counsel did not. Defense counsel has yet
to offer an explanation for their absence; indeed, they have been completely silent.
By November 22, 2017, defense counsel shall show cause in writing why they should not
be sanctioned for failing to appear. By November 28, 2017, counsel for both sides shall submit a
joint letter with an update on the remaining dispute by emailing it to
[e-mail]. The court fully expects that the dispute will have been
resolved by that time.

22
23

27
28

I

Judge D

ER

H

26

ERED

ORD
T IS SO

______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge
onna M

RT

25

Dated: November 21, 2017

NO

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S

21

RT
U
O

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

20

R NIA

12

Defendants.

UNIT
ED

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

SPARTACUS 20TH L.P., et al.,

FO

10

v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
DEFENSE COUNSEL SHOULD NOT BE
SANCTIONED FOR FAILURE TO
APPEAR AT THE FURTHER
TELEPHONIC SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE

LI

9

Case No. 17-cv-00795-JST (DMR)

A

7

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C