Lagree Technologies, Inc. et al v. Spartacus 20th L.P. et al

Filing 86

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 85 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time for Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants to Reply to Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Patent Infringement Claims and Related Counterclaims Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2) and 12(b)(1) filed by Maximum Fitness Incorporated, Sebastien Lagree, Lagree Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 5, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 William A. Delgado (Bar No. 222666) wdelgado@willenken.com WILLENKEN WILSON LOH & DELGADO LLP 707 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 3850 Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 955-9240 Facsimile: (213) 955-9250 Chad E. Ziegler (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) chad@neustel.com Edward K. Runyan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) edward@neustel.com Michelle G. Breit (Bar No. 133143) michelle@neustel.com NEUSTEL LAW OFFICES, LTD 2534 South University Drive, Suite 4 Fargo, North Dakota 58103 Telephone: (701) 281-8822 Facsimile: (701) 237-0544 Attorneys for Counterclaim Defendants LAGREE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., LAGREE FITNESS, INC., MAXIMUM FITNESS INCORPORATED, SEBASTIEN LAGREE and SPX FITNESS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 19 LAGREE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., LAGREE FITNESS, INC., MAXIMUM FITNESS INCORPORATED, AND SEBASTIEN LAGREE, Plaintiffs, 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 v. SPARTACUS 20TH L.P., SPARTACUS 20TH G.P., INC., PHILIP R. PALUMBO, JAKOB IRION, BODYROK FRANCHISE, L.P., BODYROK FRANCHISE G.P., INC., EXERCISE TECHNOLOGIES, L.P., BODYROK MARINA, LP., SCULPT FITNESS BERKELEY, LLC, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, CASE NO.: 3:17-CV-00795-JST PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFFSCOUNTERDEFENDANTS TO REPLY TO MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S PATENT INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS PURSUANT TO FED.R. CIV. 41(a)(2) AND 12(b)(1) AND [PROPOSED ORDER]. Defendants. 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 SPARTACUS 20TH L.P., SPARTACUS 20TH G.P., INC., PHILIP R. PALUMBO, JAKOB IRION, BODYROK FRANCHISE, L.P., BODYROK FRANCHISE G.P., INC., EXERCISE TECHNOLOGIES, L.P., BODYROK MARINA, LP., SCULPT FITNESS BERKELEY, LLC, AND SPARTACUS LOMBARD, L.P., Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. LAGREE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., LAGREE FITNESS, INC., MAXIMUM FITNESS INCORPORATED, AND SEBASTIEN LAGREE, SPX FITNESS, INC., AND ROES 1-10, INCLUSIVE Counterclaim Defendants. 12 13 14 15 TO THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR AND THE CLERK OF THE COURT: Pursuant to Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2(a) of the Civil Local Rules (L.R.), Plaintiffs and 16 Counterclaim Defendants LAGREE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., LAGREE FITNESS, INC., 17 MAXIMUM FITNESS INCORPORATED and SEBASTIEN LAGREE (“Plaintiffs”), and 18 Counterclaim Plaintiffs SPARTACUS 20TH L.P., SPARTACUS 20TH G.P., INC., PHILIP P. 19 20 21 22 23 PALUMBO, JAKOB IRION, BODYROK FRANCHISE, L.P., BODYROK FRANCHISE G.P., INC., EXERCISE TECHNOLOGIES, L.P., BODYROK MARINA, L.P., SCULPT FITNESS BERKELEY, LLC, and SPARTACUS LOMBARD, L.P. (“Defendants”) (hereinafter collectively the “Parties”), stipulate as follows: 24 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ deadline to respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ 25 Patent Infringement Claims and Related Counterclaims Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2) and 26 12(b)(1) (“Motion to Dismiss”) is August 4, 2017, in accordance with L.R. 7-3(c). 27 28 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel informed Defendants’ counsel that Plaintiff Sebastien 2 1 Lagree is out of the country and unavailable to assist with preparation of the reply to the Motion 2 to Dismiss until August 14, 2017 and, in addition, Plaintiffs’ counsel has certain scheduled 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 obligations, including a hearing during the week of August 7, 2017. WHEREAS, based on the foregoing, the Parties met and conferred and stipulated to an extension of time for Plaintiffs to file their reply to the Motion to Dismiss up to and including August 18, 2017. WHEREAS, the Parties have stipulated to four previous time modifications in connection with motions and responses to the Parties’ respective pleadings on April 11, 2017 (Dkt. No. 35) and May 18, 2017 (Dkt. No. 51), June 14, 2017 (Dkt. No. 68), and July 20, 2017 (Dkt. 82). WHEREAS, this stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by the Court order. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby 15 stipulate and agree that Plaintiffs’ reply to the Motion to Dismiss shall be filed no later than 16 August 18, 2017. 17 Dated: August 3, 2017 NEUSTEL LAW OFFICES, LTD 18 19 /s/ Edward K. Runyan Edward K. Runyan (Pro Hac Vice) Chad E. Ziegler (Pro Hac Vice) Michelle G. Breit (Bar No. 133143) 20 21 22 Attorneys for Counter-defendants, LAGREE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., LAGREE FITNESS, INC., MAXIMUM FITNESS INCORPORATED, SEBASTIEN LAGREE, and SPX FITNESS, INC. 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 1 2 3 Dated: August 3, 2017 /s/ Michael D. Kanach Robert P. Andris (SBN: 130290) Michael D. Kanach (SBN: 271215) Kevin W. Alexander (SBN: 175204) 4 5 Attorneys for Counter-plaintiffs, SPARTACUS 20TH L.P., SPARTACUS 20TH G.P., INC., PHILIP R. PALUMBO, JAKOB IRION, BODYROK FRANCHISE, L.P., BODYROK FRANCHISE, G.P., INC., EXERCISE TECHNOLOGIES, L.P., BODYROK MARINA, LP. SCULPT FITNESS BERKELEY, LLC, and SPARTACUS LOMBARD, L.P. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 DATED:_August 5, 2017_ _______________________________ __ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Honorable Jon. S. Tigar 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 FILER’S ATTESTATION I, Michelle G. Breit, am an ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS-COUNTERDEFENDANTS TO REPLY TO MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S PATENT INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS PURSUANT TO FED.R. CIV. 41(a)(2) AND 12(b)(1) 7 AND [PROPOSED ORDER]. Plaintiffs’ counsel obtained Defendants’ counsel’s authority prior 8 to the filing of this document. In compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that counsel 9 for the Defendants concur in this filing. 10 11 12 Dated: August 3, 2107 /s/ Michelle G. Breit Michelle G. Breit 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?