Hill v. T.J. Maxx of CA, LLC

Filing 14

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 5/25/2017 10:00 AM. Show Cause Response due by 5/9/2017. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 5/2/2017. (mejlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2017)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 TERESA HILL, Case No. 17-cv-00847-MEJ Plaintiff, 5 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 6 7 T.J. MAXX OF CA, LLC, Defendant. 8 9 10 On April 13, 2017, Defendant T.J. Maxx of CA, LLC filed a Motion to Compel United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Arbitration, with a noticed hearing date of May 25, 2017. Dkt. No. 13. Responses were due April 12 27, 2017; however, Plaintiff Teresa Hill failed to file an opposition pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7. 13 Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the motion hearing and ORDERS Plaintiff to show 14 cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with 15 court deadlines. Plaintiff shall file a declaration by May 9, 2017. If a responsive declaration is 16 filed, the Court shall either issue an order based on the declaration or conduct a hearing on May 17 25, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, 18 California. Notice is hereby provided that failure to file a written response will be deemed an 19 admission that Plaintiff does not intend to prosecute, and the case will be dismissed without 20 prejudice. Thus, it is imperative that the Court receive a written response by the deadline above. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May 2, 2017 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?