Robertson et al v. Republic of Nicaragua, The et al
Filing
46
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 6/8/2017. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 6/22/2017 at 2:00 PM. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 24, 2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JOSEPHENIE ROBERTSON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 17-cv-00852-JST
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
Re: ECF No. 1
REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA, THE, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
Plaintiff Josephine E. Robertson’s purports to bring this case for herself and on behalf of
14
seven other named plaintiffs, although none of the putative named plaintiffs has signed the
15
complaint. ECF No. 1 at 1, 10-11. The same complaint states that Plaintiffs bring “this Class
16
Action Complaint against Defendants the Republic of Nicaragua, Daniel Ortega, and the
17
Sandinista Party . . . on behalf of all the Miskitu peoples.” ECF No. 1 at 2. Plaintiff Robertson is
18
not represented by an attorney, however, and is not an attorney herself. Id. at 25.
19
“Pro se plaintiffs are not adequate class representatives able to fairly represent and
20
adequately protect the interests of [a] class.” Blake v. Cty. of Santa Clara, No. 16-CV-01279-
21
HSG, 2016 WL 4073339, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2016) (citing Oxendine v. Williams, 509 F.2d
22
1405, 1407 (4th Cir. 1975); Simon v. Hartford Life, Inc., 546 F.3d 661, 664-65 (9th Cir. 2008)).
23
“[A] litigant appearing in propria persona has no authority to represent anyone other than
24
[herself].” Russell v. United States, 308 F.2d 78, 79 (9th Cir. 1962).
25
Plaintiff may not maintain a purported class action, or bring claims on behalf of the other
26
seven named plaintiffs, unrepresented. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE
27
why the Court should not dismiss all claims except her individual claim on her own behalf. A
28
hearing on this Order to Show Cause is set for June 22, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. to coincide with the
1
2
3
4
5
pending motion to dismiss. Plaintiff’s written response is due by June 8, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 24, 2017
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?