Wang et al v. Golf Tailor, LLC et al
Filing
113
ORDER.The court previously raised with the parties the issue about service on Kingstar. (Dkt. Entry ECF No. 109.) The court asks the parties to consider whether they would stipulate to sever the claims against the non-appearing defendant. The c laims would be assigned a new case number, and the case would remain assigned to the undersigned. Ultimately Golf Tailor will have to serve Kingstar, but the case also can move forward with the served parties. (This is a process used by the magistrat e judges in situations such as this.) The court asks the parties to submit their joint position as soon as is practicable and in any event by January 4, 2018. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 12/22/2017) (Beeler, Laurel).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
San Francisco Division
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
JONATHAN WANG, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 17-cv-00898-LB
ORDER REGARDING UNSERVED
DEFENDANT
v.
GOLF TAILOR, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
The court previously raised with the parties the issue about service on Kingstar. (Dkt. Entry –
18
ECF No. 109.) The court asks the parties to consider whether they would stipulate to sever the
19
claims against the non-appearing defendant. The claims would be assigned a new case number,
20
21
22
23
24
25
and the case would remain assigned to the undersigned. Ultimately Golf Tailor will have to serve
Kingstar, but the case also can move forward with the served parties. (This is a process used by the
magistrate judges in situations such as this.) The court asks the parties to submit their joint
position as soon as is practicable and in any event by January 4, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 22, 2017
______________________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
26
27
28
ORDER – No. 17-cv-00898-LB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?