Lil' Man in the Boat, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 23

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 22 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Initial Disclosures and to Continue Initial Case Management Conference to June 15, 2017 filed by Lil' Man in the Boat, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 6/5/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/15/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 22, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2017)

Download PDF
1 David R. Ongaro (State Bar No. 154698) dongaro@ongaropc.com 2 ONGARO PC 50 California Street, Suite 3325 3 San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone: (415) 433-3900 4 Fax: (415) 433-3950 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 LIL’ MAN IN THE BOAT, INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 LIL’ MAN IN THE BOAT, INC., a California 13 Corporation. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 3:17-cv-00904 JST STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO JUNE 15, 2017 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and SAN FRANCISCO PORT COMMISSION, operating under the title PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO, ELAINE FORBES, Interim Executive Director of the San Francisco Port; PETER DALEY, Deputy Director, Maritime, the San Francisco Port; JEFF BAUER, Deputy Director of Real Estate, the San Francisco Port; JOE MONROE, Harbormaster, South Beach Harbor, Pier 40, 22 23 Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 WHEREAS, Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss, which is scheduled for hearing 2 on June 15, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.; 3 WHEREAS, the initial case management conference is currently scheduled for June 7, 4 2017 at 2:00 p.m.; 5 WHEREAS, the parties agree that, subject to the Court’s availability and approval, it 6 would be efficient to hold the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss and the initial case management 7 conference on the same date; 8 WHEREAS, the parties have also agreed that their initial disclosures shall be exchanged 9 two weeks after the Court’s Order resolving the Motion to Dismiss; 10 THEREFORE, it is hereby STIPULATED, by and between the parties that, subject to the 11 Court’s approval, the initial case management conference shall be continued from June 7, 2017 at 12 2:00 p.m. until June 15, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. It is further stipulated that the parties’ initial 13 disclosures shall be exchanged two weeks after the date of the Court’s Order resolving the Motion 14 to Dismiss. 15 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 16 17 Date: May 18, 2017 ONGARO PC 18 s/David R. Ongaro David R. Ongaro Attorneys for Plaintiff LIL’ MAN IN THE BOAT, INC. 19 20 21 22 Date: May 18, 2017 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney WAYNE SNODGRASS TARA M. STEELEY 23 24 Deputy City Attorneys 25 26 s/ Tara M. Steeley Tara M. Steeley Attorneys for Defendants 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 PROPOSED ORDER Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that the initial case 3 management conference in this matter shall be continued from June 7, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. until 4 June 15, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. to be held following the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss. It is further 5 ORDERED that pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, the parties’ initial disclosures shall be 6 exchanged two weeks after the date of the Court’s Order resolving the Motion to Dismiss. 7 8 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 May 22 DATED: _________________, 2017 10 Hon. Jon S. Tigar 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 ATTESTATION REGARDING SIGNATURES I attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document. 4 s/David R. Ongaro David R. Ongaro 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?