Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
120
ORDER RE #95 #114 #115 EXCESSIVE REDACTIONS. Signed by Judge Alsup on 3/28/2017. Responses due by 3/29/2017. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2017)
Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 120 Filed 03/28/17 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
WAYMO LLC,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
No. C 17-00939 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER RE EXCESSIVE
REDACTIONS
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
/
With respect to defendants’ administrative motion to shorten time for briefing and
16
hearing on their motion to compel arbitration, the Court first states its strong concern that the
17
memorandum in support of the motion to compel is overly redacted. Our federal courts belong
18
to the public, and the public and the press have a legitimate interest in looking over our
19
shoulders to see the work in progress in our courts. The essence of our work concerns
20
evaluating competing arguments. Parties should not hide those arguments under seal out of a
21
desire to shroud business dealings in secrecy.
22
The Court intends to grant a measure of expedited hearing on the motion but before
23
doing so insists that the parties meet and confer and agree on a wholly public version of the
24
motion that is completely unredacted, or show good cause for maintaining privacy over any
25
specific portions. Please do so by MARCH 29 AT 5:00 P.M.
26
27
28
Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 120 Filed 03/28/17 Page 2 of 2
1
This theme runs throughout the brief history of this case. Please do not claim privacy
2
over anything less than true trade secrets or other material clearly deserving to be under seal.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: March 28, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?