Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 132

ORDER RE DUE DILIGENCE REPORT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 3/31/2017. (whalc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 WAYMO LLC, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 No. C 17-00939 WHA Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE DUE DILIGENCE REPORT UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. / 14 15 At the conference on March 29, defense counsel indicated that, prior to the acquisition 16 of Otto Trucking LLC and Ottomotto LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc., obtained a due diligence 17 report prepared by a third party that may (or may not) have referenced the collection of 18 allegedly downloaded documents. Uber intends to put that report on a privilege log. Unless 19 privileged, the aforementioned due diligence report should be produced to plaintiff Waymo 20 LLC. If a claim of privilege is asserted, it should be very promptly claimed with all of the 21 required details disclosed. Any motion under the Fifth Amendment to suspend the production 22 or privilege log requirement must be brought by APRIL 4 AT NOON, if at all, so as to avoid delay 23 leading up to the hearing on May 3. Defense counsel shall immediately notify separate counsel 24 for Anthony Levandowski of this deadline. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: March 31, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?