Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
ORDER RE DUE DILIGENCE REPORT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 3/31/2017. (whalc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2017)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 17-00939 WHA
ORDER RE DUE DILIGENCE
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
At the conference on March 29, defense counsel indicated that, prior to the acquisition
of Otto Trucking LLC and Ottomotto LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc., obtained a due diligence
report prepared by a third party that may (or may not) have referenced the collection of
allegedly downloaded documents. Uber intends to put that report on a privilege log. Unless
privileged, the aforementioned due diligence report should be produced to plaintiff Waymo
LLC. If a claim of privilege is asserted, it should be very promptly claimed with all of the
required details disclosed. Any motion under the Fifth Amendment to suspend the production
or privilege log requirement must be brought by APRIL 4 AT NOON, if at all, so as to avoid delay
leading up to the hearing on May 3. Defense counsel shall immediately notify separate counsel
for Anthony Levandowski of this deadline.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 31, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?