Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 132

ORDER RE DUE DILIGENCE REPORT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 3/31/2017. (whalc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2017)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

WAYMO LLC,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

No. C 17-00939 WHA

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER RE DUE DILIGENCE
REPORT

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
/

14
15

At the conference on March 29, defense counsel indicated that, prior to the acquisition

16

of Otto Trucking LLC and Ottomotto LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc., obtained a due diligence

17

report prepared by a third party that may (or may not) have referenced the collection of

18

allegedly downloaded documents. Uber intends to put that report on a privilege log. Unless

19

privileged, the aforementioned due diligence report should be produced to plaintiff Waymo

20

LLC. If a claim of privilege is asserted, it should be very promptly claimed with all of the

21

required details disclosed. Any motion under the Fifth Amendment to suspend the production

22

or privilege log requirement must be brought by APRIL 4 AT NOON, if at all, so as to avoid delay

23

leading up to the hearing on May 3. Defense counsel shall immediately notify separate counsel

24

for Anthony Levandowski of this deadline.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: March 31, 2017.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE