Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 1444

Order by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting in part and denying in part #1377 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(jsclc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2017)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

WAYMO LLC,
Plaintiff,

7
8
9
10

Case No.17-cv-00939-WHA (JSC)
ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO SEAL

v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Re: Dkt. No. 1377

Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Defendant Otto Trucking’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Portions of Its

13

Opposition to Motions to Quash and Exhibits is now ripe for review. (Dkt. Nos. 1377.) Plaintiff

14

has a submitted a Declaration in support of sealing, narrowing the portions it requests to be sealed.

15

(Dkt. No. 1433.) The Court has carefully considered the narrowed redactions and the motion is

16

GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is DENIED as to the redactions in the letter

17

brief itself (Dkt. No. 1433-2) and as to the redactions in Exhibit 10 (Dkt. No. 1433-16) except for

18

the email addresses, the technical information on the first and sixth pages (id. at 2, 7), and the IP

19

address on the third page (id. at 4). This information is not properly sealable as it contains neither

20

trade secret information nor information otherwise subject to sealing. Plaintiff has, however,

21

established good cause for the remainder of the proposed redactions and the administrative

22

motion to seal is otherwise GRANTED.

23

This Order disposes of Docket No. 1377.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated: September 1, 2017

26
27
28

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge