Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 225

COURT-ORDERED INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANTS TO ASSIST COURT IN SUPERVISING CASE MANAGEMENT AND EXPEDITED DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Alsup on 4/12/2017. Responses due by 4/25/2017. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2017)

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 225 Filed 04/12/17 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

WAYMO LLC,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

Plaintiff,
COURT-ORDERED
INTERROGATORIES TO
DEFENDANTS TO ASSIST
COURT IN SUPERVISING
CASE MANAGEMENT AND
EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

13

Defendants.
/

14
15

No. C 17-00939 WHA

By APRIL 25 AT NOON, defendants shall please answer the following interrogatories

16

under oath.

17

COURT INTERROGATORY NO. 1 TO DEFENDANTS

18

Identify by name and position each present and former officer, director, or employee of

19

defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (including attorneys), who received prior to the acquisition

20

of Ottomotto LLC and Otto Trucking LLC any electronic or paper material or communication

21

regarding LiDAR or any aspect thereof from:

22

(i)

Anthony Levandowski or his representatives, or

23

(ii)

Anyone else advising that the material came from Anthony Levandowski or his

24
25
26
27
28

representatives.
Any name or communication already disclosed on a privilege log may be omitted.

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 225 Filed 04/12/17 Page 2 of 2

1
2

COURT INTERROGATORY NO. 2 TO DEFENDANTS
For each such person, identify and describe the material or communication received with

3

sufficient detail to establish any privilege from production, or simply produce the material or

4

communication received to plaintiff’s counsel by APRIL 25.

5
6
7

Any name or communication already disclosed on a privilege log may be omitted.
COURT INTERROGATORY NO. 3 TO DEFENDANTS
Identify and describe in approximate chronological sequence all LiDAR-related work

8

Anthony Levandowski has done since leaving Waymo, including whether or not that work led

9

to or related to any prototype or device, and describe how and where that work is reflected.

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13

Dated: April 12, 2017.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2