Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
ORDER REGARDING WAYMOS IDENTIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS FOR THE COURTS IN CAMERA REVIEW. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on January 8, 2018. (jsclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2018)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No.17-cv-00939-WHA (JSC)
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
ORDER REGARDING WAYMO’S
IDENTIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS
FOR THE COURT’S IN CAMERA
This Court ordered Uber to provide the Court for its in camera review 50 pages Waymo
identified as potentially improperly redacted on attorney-client or attorney work-product grounds.
(Dkt. No. 2454.) The Special Master has now brought to the Court’s attention a dispute among
the parties as to whether the pages Waymo identifies must be from documents logged or produced
as part of the supplemental post-November 2017 discovery. They must. Waymo’s December 29,
2017 letter brief was focused exclusively on Uber’s supplemental production and logs; Waymo
did not make any argument as to why this Court should review in camera documents long ago
produced in this lawsuit and this Court did not rule that it would review such documents.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 8, 2018
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?