Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 2458

ORDER REGARDING WAYMOS IDENTIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS FOR THE COURTS IN CAMERA REVIEW. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on January 8, 2018. (jsclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 WAYMO LLC, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No.17-cv-00939-WHA (JSC) v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., ORDER REGARDING WAYMO’S IDENTIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS FOR THE COURT’S IN CAMERA REVIEW Defendants. 12 13 This Court ordered Uber to provide the Court for its in camera review 50 pages Waymo 14 identified as potentially improperly redacted on attorney-client or attorney work-product grounds. 15 (Dkt. No. 2454.) The Special Master has now brought to the Court’s attention a dispute among 16 the parties as to whether the pages Waymo identifies must be from documents logged or produced 17 as part of the supplemental post-November 2017 discovery. They must. Waymo’s December 29, 18 2017 letter brief was focused exclusively on Uber’s supplemental production and logs; Waymo 19 did not make any argument as to why this Court should review in camera documents long ago 20 produced in this lawsuit and this Court did not rule that it would review such documents. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 8, 2018 23 24 25 26 27 28 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?