Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 2458

ORDER REGARDING WAYMOS IDENTIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS FOR THE COURTS IN CAMERA REVIEW. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on January 8, 2018. (jsclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2018)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

7

WAYMO LLC,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No.17-cv-00939-WHA (JSC)

v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

ORDER REGARDING WAYMO’S
IDENTIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS
FOR THE COURT’S IN CAMERA
REVIEW

Defendants.

12
13

This Court ordered Uber to provide the Court for its in camera review 50 pages Waymo

14

identified as potentially improperly redacted on attorney-client or attorney work-product grounds.

15

(Dkt. No. 2454.) The Special Master has now brought to the Court’s attention a dispute among

16

the parties as to whether the pages Waymo identifies must be from documents logged or produced

17

as part of the supplemental post-November 2017 discovery. They must. Waymo’s December 29,

18

2017 letter brief was focused exclusively on Uber’s supplemental production and logs; Waymo

19

did not make any argument as to why this Court should review in camera documents long ago

20

produced in this lawsuit and this Court did not rule that it would review such documents.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 8, 2018

23
24
25
26
27
28

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge