Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 263

NOTICE RE QUESTIONS FOR HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION. Signed by Judge Alsup on 4/25/2017. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2017)

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 263 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

WAYMO LLC,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

No. C 17-00939 WHA

Plaintiff,
v.

NOTICE RE QUESTIONS FOR
HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

13

Defendants.
/

14
15

At the hearing this Thursday, both sides should please be prepared to succinctly address

16

the following questions with copies of relevant case law highlighted and ready to hand up to the

17

judge, as well as extra copies for opposing counsel. Unless otherwise requested, please limit

18

supporting case law to one on-point decision per issue.

19

1.

20

agreement with Levandowski containing an arbitration clause? Will Waymo seek to use

21

any such agreement for any purpose in this case?

22

2.

23

those asserted herein that rely on any agreement containing an arbitration clause?

24

3.

25

provisional relief in arbitration be backed up by the contempt power of the court? Has

26

any reported decision ever dealt with this issue?

27
28

Will Waymo forgo any reliance in this case on any employment or other

Will Waymo forgo any claims in any forum against Levandowski similar to

How would provisional relief work in this case if sent to arbitration? Would

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 263 Filed 04/25/17 Page 2 of 2

1

4.

How much discovery and motion practice have occurred in Waymo’s arbitration

2

proceedings against Levandowski to date?

3
4
5

Dated: April 25, 2017.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2