Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
44
ORDER RE #42 LETTER DATED MARCH 13, 2017. Signed by Judge Alsup on 3/13/2017. Response due by 3/15/2017. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2017)
Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 44 Filed 03/13/17 Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
WAYMO LLC,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER RE LETTER DATED
MARCH 13, 2017
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
/
15
16
No. C 17-00939 WHA
The Court has reviewed defendants’ letter dated March 13, 2017 (Dkt. No. 42). Defense
17
counsel shall please bring to the case management conference on March 16 the specific
18
person(s) in Uber’s legal department who defendants believe should be able to see the redacted
19
materials at issue, as well as the resumes for such person(s). The Court requests, however, that
20
counsel for both sides work this snafu out before the case management conference on March 16.
21
Plaintiff should remember that it seeks extraordinary and drastic relief. Every day counts, but
22
preliminary relief may be postponed until this problem is resolved.
23
Plaintiff shall please respond to defendants’ letter by MARCH 15 AT NOON.
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Dated: March 13, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?