Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 44

ORDER RE 42 LETTER DATED MARCH 13, 2017. Signed by Judge Alsup on 3/13/2017. Response due by 3/15/2017. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2017)

Download PDF
Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 44 Filed 03/13/17 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 WAYMO LLC, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE LETTER DATED MARCH 13, 2017 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. / 15 16 No. C 17-00939 WHA The Court has reviewed defendants’ letter dated March 13, 2017 (Dkt. No. 42). Defense 17 counsel shall please bring to the case management conference on March 16 the specific 18 person(s) in Uber’s legal department who defendants believe should be able to see the redacted 19 materials at issue, as well as the resumes for such person(s). The Court requests, however, that 20 counsel for both sides work this snafu out before the case management conference on March 16. 21 Plaintiff should remember that it seeks extraordinary and drastic relief. Every day counts, but 22 preliminary relief may be postponed until this problem is resolved. 23 Plaintiff shall please respond to defendants’ letter by MARCH 15 AT NOON. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: March 13, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?