Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
441
Discovery Order re: Waymo's expedited discovery. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 5/15/2017. (Corley, Jacqueline) (Filed on 5/15/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
WAYMO LLC,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No.17-cv-00939-WHA (JSC)
ORDER RE: PARAGRAPH SIX OF
DISTRICT COURT'S PI ORDER
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
On May 11, 2017 the district court granted in part Waymo’s motion for a preliminary
14
injunction. Among other remedies, the court granted Waymo “further expedited discovery in aid
15
of possible further provisional relief.” The court also stated that “[a]fter Waymo has exhausted its
16
expedited discovery, it may continue with normal discovery.” (Dkt. No. 433 at 25-26.) Uber
17
interprets this Order as staying normal discovery until Waymo exhausts its permitted expedited
18
discovery, while Waymo insists the district court intended no such thing as a delay in normal
19
discovery would prejudice Waymo given the short time frame to complete discovery. After
20
reviewing the district court’s order, and conferring with the district court, the Court rules that
21
Waymo must first proceed with the expedited discovery ordered in the district court’s preliminary
22
injunction order. Once Waymo exhausts the expedited discovery, it may continue discovery with
23
the standard deadlines. Waymo may, however, concurrently propound requests for admissions
24
since the district court’s expedited discovery order did not provide for such discovery. Further,
25
Waymo does not need to propound new discovery requests if it wishes the expedited schedule to
26
apply to previously-requested discovery. This process is not designed to alleviate any burden on
27
Uber, but rather to ensure that the expedited discovery process is exhausted first. This discovery
28
phasing may be revisited depending on the progress of the expedited discovery. The third-party
1
discovery as to Gorilla Circuits may proceed, as agreed to by Uber.
2
Uber may continue its discovery; however, it is not expedited.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
Dated: May 15, 2017
5
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?