Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting in part and denying in part ( #456 & #457 ) Discovery Letter Brief. (Corley, Jacqueline) (Filed on 5/17/2017) Modified on 5/18/2017 (ahm, COURT STAFF).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No.17-cv-00939-WHA (JSC)
ORDER REGARDING SUR-REPLY
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants Uber and Ottomotto have asked to file a four-page sur-reply in support of their
opposition to Waymo’s motion to compel. Without subscribing to Defendants’ assertion that
certain arguments should have been made in the original motion to compel, Defendants’ request is
granted in part. The sur-reply must be limited to the issues raised in Defendants’ request, shall not
exceed four pages, and shall be filed on or before Friday, May 19, 2017. Further, Defendants are
not permitted to submit any new evidence in support of their sur-reply. Waymo may orally
respond to Defendants’ arguments at the hearing on May 25, 2017.
This Order disposes of Docket Nos. 456 and 457.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 17, 2017
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?