Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 460

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting in part and denying in part ( #456 & #457 ) Discovery Letter Brief. (Corley, Jacqueline) (Filed on 5/17/2017) Modified on 5/18/2017 (ahm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 WAYMO LLC, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No.17-cv-00939-WHA (JSC) ORDER REGARDING SUR-REPLY REQUEST v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. 12 13 Defendants Uber and Ottomotto have asked to file a four-page sur-reply in support of their 14 opposition to Waymo’s motion to compel. Without subscribing to Defendants’ assertion that 15 certain arguments should have been made in the original motion to compel, Defendants’ request is 16 granted in part. The sur-reply must be limited to the issues raised in Defendants’ request, shall not 17 exceed four pages, and shall be filed on or before Friday, May 19, 2017. Further, Defendants are 18 not permitted to submit any new evidence in support of their sur-reply. Waymo may orally 19 respond to Defendants’ arguments at the hearing on May 25, 2017. 20 This Order disposes of Docket Nos. 456 and 457. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: May 17, 2017 23 24 25 26 27 28 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?