Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 460

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting in part and denying in part ( #456 & #457 ) Discovery Letter Brief. (Corley, Jacqueline) (Filed on 5/17/2017) Modified on 5/18/2017 (ahm, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

WAYMO LLC,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No.17-cv-00939-WHA (JSC)
ORDER REGARDING SUR-REPLY
REQUEST

v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

12
13

Defendants Uber and Ottomotto have asked to file a four-page sur-reply in support of their

14

opposition to Waymo’s motion to compel. Without subscribing to Defendants’ assertion that

15

certain arguments should have been made in the original motion to compel, Defendants’ request is

16

granted in part. The sur-reply must be limited to the issues raised in Defendants’ request, shall not

17

exceed four pages, and shall be filed on or before Friday, May 19, 2017. Further, Defendants are

18

not permitted to submit any new evidence in support of their sur-reply. Waymo may orally

19

respond to Defendants’ arguments at the hearing on May 25, 2017.

20

This Order disposes of Docket Nos. 456 and 457.

21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22

Dated: May 17, 2017

23
24
25
26
27
28

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge