Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 499

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART #485 MOTION TO REINSTATE PROVISIONAL RELIEF DEADLINE by Hon. William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2017)

Download PDF
Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 499 Filed 05/24/17 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 WAYMO LLC, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO REINSTATE PROVISIONAL RELIEF DEADLINE v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. / 14 15 No. C 17-00939 WHA The Court has considered plaintiff Waymo LLC’s motion to reinstate the May 31 16 deadline for defendants to comply with the second item of the May 11 provisional relief order 17 (Dkt. No. 485) and defendants’ partial opposition thereto (Dkt. No. 494). The motion is 18 GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 19 Defendants shall comply with the second item of provisional relief by the original 20 deadline of MAY 31 AT NOON except insofar as compliance would implicate either issues raised 21 by non-party Anthony Levandowski’s motion to modify the May 11 provisional relief order 22 (Dkt. No. 466) or privilege disputes currently pending before Judge Corley, in which case the 23 deadline remains JUNE 23 AT NOON. This order supersedes and partially vacates the prior order 24 continuing the provisional relief deadline (Dkt. No. 471). 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: May 24, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?