Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
499
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART #485 MOTION TO REINSTATE PROVISIONAL RELIEF DEADLINE by Hon. William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2017)
Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 499 Filed 05/24/17 Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
WAYMO LLC,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
AND DENYING IN PART
MOTION TO REINSTATE
PROVISIONAL RELIEF
DEADLINE
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
/
14
15
No. C 17-00939 WHA
The Court has considered plaintiff Waymo LLC’s motion to reinstate the May 31
16
deadline for defendants to comply with the second item of the May 11 provisional relief order
17
(Dkt. No. 485) and defendants’ partial opposition thereto (Dkt. No. 494). The motion is
18
GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
19
Defendants shall comply with the second item of provisional relief by the original
20
deadline of MAY 31 AT NOON except insofar as compliance would implicate either issues raised
21
by non-party Anthony Levandowski’s motion to modify the May 11 provisional relief order
22
(Dkt. No. 466) or privilege disputes currently pending before Judge Corley, in which case the
23
deadline remains JUNE 23 AT NOON. This order supersedes and partially vacates the prior order
24
continuing the provisional relief deadline (Dkt. No. 471).
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated: May 24, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?