Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 679

SECOND ORDER RE SCHEDULING OF DEPOSITIONS (re #622 #671 #672 ). Signed by Judge Alsup on 6/21/2017. Responses due by 6/22/2017. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 WAYMO LLC, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 No. C 17-00939 WHA Plaintiff, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. / 14 15 SECOND ORDER RE SCHEDULING OF DEPOSITIONS The parties have utterly failed to comply with the Court’s “Order re Scheduling of 16 Depositions” dated June 14, 2017 (Dkt. No. 622). Consequently, each party shall submit a list 17 of the top ten depositions it wishes to take, identifying each deponent by name and advising as 18 to whom they work for. The judge will assign dates. The lists must be filed with the Court by 19 TOMORROW AT 5:00 P.M. on pain of no depositions at all for any defaulting party. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 21, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?