Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
679
SECOND ORDER RE SCHEDULING OF DEPOSITIONS (re #622 #671 #672 ). Signed by Judge Alsup on 6/21/2017. Responses due by 6/22/2017. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2017)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
WAYMO LLC,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
No. C 17-00939 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
/
14
15
SECOND ORDER RE
SCHEDULING OF
DEPOSITIONS
The parties have utterly failed to comply with the Court’s “Order re Scheduling of
16
Depositions” dated June 14, 2017 (Dkt. No. 622). Consequently, each party shall submit a list
17
of the top ten depositions it wishes to take, identifying each deponent by name and advising as
18
to whom they work for. The judge will assign dates. The lists must be filed with the Court by
19
TOMORROW AT 5:00 P.M.
on pain of no depositions at all for any defaulting party.
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: June 21, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
