Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
725
ORDER SETTING DEPOSITIONS (re #698 #699 #700 ). Signed by Judge Alsup on 6/23/2017. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2017)
Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 725 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
WAYMO LLC,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
No. C 17-00939 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
OTTOMOTTO LLC, and OTTO
TRUCKING LLC,
Defendants.
/
15
16
ORDER SETTING
DEPOSITIONS
To keep this case on track for the agreed-upon trial date, an earlier order requested that
17
counsel meet with the special master and agree upon a series of dates for all remaining
18
depositions that need to be taken. Counsel failed to do so. As a result, to keep this case on
19
track, the Court now resorts to setting a schedule and ORDERS that the following depositions go
20
forward on the following dates, all commencing at 8:00 a.m. and lasting up to seven hours:
21
NAME
DEPOSITION DATE
Pierre-Yves Droz
Monday, July 10
Bryan Salesky (by defendants)
Tuesday, July 11
24
William McCann
Wednesday, July 12
25
Drew Ulrich
Thursday, July 13
26
Larry Page
Monday, July 17
27
Max Levandowski
Tuesday, July 18
Eric Meyhofer
Wednesday, July 19
Ognen Stojanovski
Thursday, July 20
Bryan Salesky (by Waymo)
Monday, July 24
22
23
28
Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 725 Filed 06/23/17 Page 2 of 2
1
Adam Bentley
Tuesday, July 25
2
Zachary Morris
Wednesday, July 26
3
Travis Kalanick
Thursday, July 27
4
Emil Michael
Monday, July 31
5
Brian McClendon
Tuesday, August 1
John Krafcik
Wednesday, August 2
Eric Tate
Thursday, August 3
Sebastian Thrun
Monday, August 7
Sam Lenius
Tuesday, August 8
Chris Urmson
Wednesday, August 9
Anthony Levandowski
Thursday, August 10
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
The foregoing schedule may be modified upon written agreement in advance by all
12
parties. This schedule is without prejudice to any motion, made promptly and in good faith
13
before Judge Corley, for a protective order. Any unilateral motion to change a date on the
14
schedule, however, must (1) show compelling reasons — not merely good cause — for the
15
requested change and (2) offer an alternative date reasonably close to the assigned date.
16
Otherwise, unavailability of deponents is no excuse. They must make themselves
17
available. If documents reasonably called for before a deposition are produced after the
18
deposition, the party making the late production of documents shall pay for all expenses,
19
including attorney’s fees, associated with re-opening the deposition to allow further
20
examination with respect to the subject matter of the belatedly-produced documents. This order
21
is not a substitute for subpoenas, which must still be served on non-party deponents. This
22
schedule is without prejudice to counsel noticing other depositions before the discovery cut-off,
23
subject to the overall deposition limit. More than one deposition may be scheduled for the same
24
day. In no event may depositions be taken after the discovery cut-off.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
Dated: June 23, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?