Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. v. NHK International Corporation et al
Filing
176
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen adopting 167 Report and Recommendation; and denying 170 Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge. (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2019)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
INTRI-PLEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
11
v.
NHK INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 17-cv-01097-EMC
12
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION; AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RELIEF
FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL
ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Docket Nos. 167, 170
13
14
Previously, the Court referred Defendants’ motion for leave to amend their invalidity
15
contentions to a magistrate judge. On January 15, 2019, Judge Laporte issued her report and
16
recommendation (“R&R”) on Defendants’ motion. More specifically, Judge Laporte
17
recommended that Defendants’ motion be granted. See Docket No. 167 (R&R). Subsequently,
18
IPT objected to the R&R by filing a motion for relief. See Docket No. 170 (motion). The Court
19
has reviewed Judge Laporte’s R&R, IPT’s objections, and the underlying briefing on the motion
20
for leave to amend. Having done so, the Court finds Judge Laporte’s R&R thorough, complete,
21
and well reasoned and therefore adopts it in every respect. The Court accordingly denies IPT’s
22
motion for relief from Judge Laporte’s R&R.
23
This order disposes of Docket Nos. 167 and 170.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated: February 25, 2019
26
27
28
______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?