Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. v. NHK International Corporation et al

Filing 69

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Claims Construction Hearing reset for 1/29/2018 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/21/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

JEFFREY E. OSTROW (SBN 213118)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL H. JOSHI (SBN 302184)
[e-mail]
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
NOAH M. LEIBOWITZ (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
425 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
INTRI-PLEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Case No. 3:17-cv-01097-EMC

Plaintiff,
v.
NHK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; NHK
SPRING CO., LTD.; OGAKI SEIKO CO., LTD.;
AND SEIKO HIGH TEC CORP.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER AMENDING CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

Defendants.

23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
AMENDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01097-EMC

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. (“IPT”) and Defendants NHK

1
2

International Corporation, NHK Spring Co., Ltd., Ogaki Seiko Co., Ltd., and Seiko High Tec

3

Corp. (collectively “Defendants”) filed their Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement

4

on October 16, 2017 (D.I. 66);

5

WHEREAS IPT’s Opening Claim Construction Brief is due November 22, 2017;

6

WHEREAS, pursuant to L.R. 6-2(a)(1), the parties state that they have been, and

7

continue to be, engaged in discussions in an attempt to narrow the areas of disagreement

8

regarding the disputed terms for construction, and have agreed to push back the claim

9

construction briefing schedule in light of these discussions;

10

WHEREAS, pursuant to L.R. 6-2(a)(2), the parties state that they previously extended by

11

stipulation the time for Defendants to answer or otherwise move in response to the complaint but

12

that no other time modifications have been made in the case; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to L.R. 6-2(a)(3), the parties state that they do not believe the

13
14

requested time modification will have an effect on the remaining schedule for the case;

15

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to

16

the approval of the Court, that the Claim Construction Schedule (D.I. 58) is amended as follows:

17

Event

18
19
20
21
22
23

Plaintiff’s Opening Claim
Construction Brief
Defendants’ Responsive
Claim Construction Brief
Plaintiff’s Reply Claim
Construction Brief
Technology Tutorial
Markman Hearing

Date Set Forth in Original
Claim Construction
Schedule (D.I. 58)
November 22, 2017

New Date

December 6, 2017

December 15, 2017

December 13, 2017

December 22, 2017

December 1, 2017

January 16, 2018 (10:00 a.m.)
January 29, 2018 (2:30 p.m.)

24
25

DATED: November 20, 2017

Respectfully submitted,

26

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

27

By:

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
AMENDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

-1-

/s/ Jeffrey E. Ostrow
Jeffrey E. Ostrow (SBN 213118)
[e-mail]
Michael H. Joshi (SBN 302184)

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01097-EMC

[e-mail]
2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

1
2
3

6

Noah M. Leibowitz (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
425 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7

Attorneys for Plaintiff

4
5

8
9

DATED: November 20, 2017

10

SINGULARITY LLP
By:

11

/s/ Frank L. Bernstein
Frank L. Bernstein (State Bar No. 189504)
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 610
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

12
13
14
15

Of Counsel:
William H. Mandir
John F. Rabena
Yoshinari Kishimoto
Fadi Kiblawi
Andrew Ritter
Arun Shome
Young Sun Kwon
SUGHRUE MION, PLLC
2100 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20037
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Attorneys for Defendants

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
AMENDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

-2-

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01097-EMC

1
2
3
4
5
6

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING
Pursuant to the Northern District of California’s Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that all
signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and
have authorized the filing.
DATED: November 20, 2017

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

7
8

By:

9

/s/ Jeffrey E. Ostrow
Jeffrey E. Ostrow (SBN 213118)
[e-mail]
Michael H. Joshi (SBN 302184)
[e-mail]
2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10
11
12
13

16

Noah M. Leibowitz (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
425 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

17

Attorneys for Plaintiff

14
15

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
AMENDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

-3-

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01097-EMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1

Pursuant to foregoing stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that that the Claim Construction

2

Event

5

9
10
11
12

11/21
DATED: ________________, 2017

UNIT
ED

RT
U
O

13

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

DERED
SO OR ED
IT S
HON. IEDWARDIM. CHEN
D FI
AS MO
DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15

NO

16

RT

17

J

ER

H

18
19

. Chen

ward M
udge Ed

R NIA

8

December 1, 2017
November 29, 2017
December 6, 2017
December 15, 2017
6
December 13, 2017
December 22, 2017
13
January 16, 2018 (10:00 a.m.)
January 29, 2018 (2:30 p.m.) 10:00 am

FO

7

Plaintiff’s Opening Claim
Construction Brief
Defendants’ Responsive
Claim Construction Brief
Plaintiff’s Reply Claim
Construction Brief
Technology Tutorial
Markman Hearing

New Date

S

6

Date Set Forth in Original
Claim Construction
Schedule (D.I. 58)
November 22, 2017

LI

4

Schedule (D.I. 58) is amended as follows:

A

3

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
AMENDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

-4-

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01097-EMC