Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. v. NHK International Corporation et al

Filing 97

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 96 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Amending Motion For Summary Judgment Briefing And Hearing Schedule filed by Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. Responses due by 5/8/2018. Replies due by 5/17/2018. Motion Hearing reset for 5/31/2018 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/23/18. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Jeffrey E. Ostrow (SBN 213118) jostrow@stblaw.com Michael H. Joshi (SBN 302184) michael.joshi@stblaw.com SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 2475 Hanover Street Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 251-5000 Facsimile: (650) 251-5002 Noah M. Leibowitz (Pro Hac Vice) nleibowitz@stblaw.com SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 425 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10017 Telephone: (212) 455-2000 Facsimile: (212) 455-2502 Attorneys for Plaintiff 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION INTRI-PLEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Case No. 3:17-cv-01097-EMC Plaintiff, v. NHK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; NHK SPRING CO., LTD.; OGAKI SEIKO CO., LTD.; AND SEIKO HIGH TEC CORP. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING MOT. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SCHEDULE CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01097-EMC 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. (“IPT”) and Defendants NHK 2 International Corporation, NHK Spring Co., LTD., Ogaki Seiko Co., LTD., and Seiko High Tec 3 Corp. (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment Of Invalidity Based on 4 Indefiniteness Under 35 U.S.C. § 112 on April 10, 2018 (D.I. 90); 5 6 7 8 9 10 WHEREAS, IPT’s response to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is currently due on April 24, 2018; WHEREAS, Defendants’ reply in support of their motion for summary judgment is currently due on May 1, 2018; WHEREAS, the motion hearing has been noticed for May 24, 2018 at 1:30 pm; WHEREAS, pursuant to L.R. 6-2(a)(1), the parties state that they have agreed to an 11 extension of the time for the opposition and reply briefing to allow time for depositions of 12 declarants who provide declarations in support of the motion or opposition, and correspondingly 13 have agreed to a later date for the motion hearing, at the Court’s convenience; 14 15 16 WHEREAS, IPT retains all rights to argue that an issue of fact precludes summary judgment; WHEREAS, pursuant to L.R. 6-2(a)(2), the parties state that IPT previously filed an 17 administrative motion regarding time to file a consent or declination to proceed before a 18 magistrate judge (D.I. 17) and the parties previously extended by stipulation (1) the time for 19 Defendants to answer or otherwise move in response to the complaint (D.I. 19) and (2) the time 20 for the Claim Construction briefing (D.I. 68), but that no other time modification has been made 21 in the case; 22 23 24 WHEREAS, pursuant to L.R. 6-2(a)(3), the parties state that they do not believe the requested time modification will have an effect on the remaining schedule for the case; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the 25 approval of the Court, that the Motion for Summary Judgment (D.I. 90) briefing and hearing 26 schedule is amended as follows: 27 28 Event Response due Reply due Date Set Forth in D.I. 90 April 24, 2018 May 1, 2018 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MOT. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SCHEDULE -1- New Date May 8, 2018 May 17, 2018 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01097-EMC 1 2 3 Motion hearing May 24, 2018 at 1:30 pm DATED: April 20, 2018 May 31, 2018 at 1:30 pm, or at the Court’s convenience Respectfully submitted, SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 4 By: 5 /s/ Jeffrey E. Ostrow Jeffrey E. Ostrow (SBN 213118) jostrow@stblaw.com Michael H. Joshi (SBN 302184) michael.joshi@stblaw.com 2475 Hanover Street Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 251-5000 Facsimile: (650) 251-5002 6 7 8 9 13 Noah M. Leibowitz (Pro Hac Vice) nleibowitz@stblaw.com Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP 425 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10017 Telephone: (212) 455-2000 Facsimile: (212) 455-2502 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. 10 11 12 15 16 DATED: April 20, 2018 SINGULARITY LLP By: 17 /s/ Frank L. Bernstein Frank L. Bernstein (State Bar No. 189504) 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 610 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 720-4650 Facsimile: (650) 720-4662 fbernstein@ipsingularity.com 18 19 20 William H. Mandir (Pro Hac Vice) John F. Rabena (Pro Hac Vice) Yoshinari Kishimoto (Pro Hac Vice) Fadi Kiblawi (Pro Hac Vice) Andrew Ritter (Pro Hac Vice) Arun Shome (Pro Hac Vice) SUGHRUE MION, PLLC 2100 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20037 Telephone: (202) 293-7060 Facsimile: (202) 293-7860 21 22 23 24 25 26 Attorneys for Defendants 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MOT. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SCHEDULE -2- CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01097-EMC 1 2 3 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Frank L. Bernstein. 4 5 /s/ Jeffrey E. Ostrow Jeffrey E. Ostrow 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MOT. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SCHEDULE -3- CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01097-EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that the briefing and hearing schedule on the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (D.I. 90) is amended as follows: 4 New Date May 8, 2018 May 17, 2018 May 31, 2018 at 1:30 pm, or at the Court’s convenience 8 9 RT 14 dwar Judge E ER H 15 16 en d M. Ch NO 13 O ORD IT IS S R NIA 12 EDWARD M. CHEN UNITED STATES DISTRICTED ER JUDGE UNIT ED 11 RT U O DATED: S 4/23/2018 10 S DISTRICT TE C TA FO 7 Date Set Forth in D.I. 90 April 24, 2018 May 1, 2018 May 24, 2018 at 1:30 pm LI 6 Event Response due Reply due Motion hearing A 5 N F D IS T IC T O R C 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MOT. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SCHEDULE -4- CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01097-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?