Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. v. NHK International Corporation et al
Filing
97
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 96 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Amending Motion For Summary Judgment Briefing And Hearing Schedule filed by Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. Responses due by 5/8/2018. Replies due by 5/17/2018. Motion Hearing reset for 5/31/2018 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/23/18. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Jeffrey E. Ostrow (SBN 213118)
jostrow@stblaw.com
Michael H. Joshi (SBN 302184)
michael.joshi@stblaw.com
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 251-5000
Facsimile: (650) 251-5002
Noah M. Leibowitz (Pro Hac Vice)
nleibowitz@stblaw.com
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
425 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10017
Telephone: (212) 455-2000
Facsimile: (212) 455-2502
Attorneys for Plaintiff
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
INTRI-PLEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Case No. 3:17-cv-01097-EMC
Plaintiff,
v.
NHK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION;
NHK SPRING CO., LTD.; OGAKI SEIKO CO.,
LTD.; AND SEIKO HIGH TEC CORP.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER AMENDING MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING
AND HEARING SCHEDULE
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING
MOT. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01097-EMC
1
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. (“IPT”) and Defendants NHK
2
International Corporation, NHK Spring Co., LTD., Ogaki Seiko Co., LTD., and Seiko High Tec
3
Corp. (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment Of Invalidity Based on
4
Indefiniteness Under 35 U.S.C. § 112 on April 10, 2018 (D.I. 90);
5
6
7
8
9
10
WHEREAS, IPT’s response to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is currently
due on April 24, 2018;
WHEREAS, Defendants’ reply in support of their motion for summary judgment is
currently due on May 1, 2018;
WHEREAS, the motion hearing has been noticed for May 24, 2018 at 1:30 pm;
WHEREAS, pursuant to L.R. 6-2(a)(1), the parties state that they have agreed to an
11
extension of the time for the opposition and reply briefing to allow time for depositions of
12
declarants who provide declarations in support of the motion or opposition, and correspondingly
13
have agreed to a later date for the motion hearing, at the Court’s convenience;
14
15
16
WHEREAS, IPT retains all rights to argue that an issue of fact precludes summary
judgment;
WHEREAS, pursuant to L.R. 6-2(a)(2), the parties state that IPT previously filed an
17
administrative motion regarding time to file a consent or declination to proceed before a
18
magistrate judge (D.I. 17) and the parties previously extended by stipulation (1) the time for
19
Defendants to answer or otherwise move in response to the complaint (D.I. 19) and (2) the time
20
for the Claim Construction briefing (D.I. 68), but that no other time modification has been made
21
in the case;
22
23
24
WHEREAS, pursuant to L.R. 6-2(a)(3), the parties state that they do not believe the
requested time modification will have an effect on the remaining schedule for the case;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the
25
approval of the Court, that the Motion for Summary Judgment (D.I. 90) briefing and hearing
26
schedule is amended as follows:
27
28
Event
Response due
Reply due
Date Set Forth in D.I. 90
April 24, 2018
May 1, 2018
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MOT. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SCHEDULE
-1-
New Date
May 8, 2018
May 17, 2018
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01097-EMC
1
2
3
Motion hearing
May 24, 2018 at 1:30 pm
DATED: April 20, 2018
May 31, 2018 at 1:30 pm, or at
the Court’s convenience
Respectfully submitted,
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
4
By:
5
/s/ Jeffrey E. Ostrow
Jeffrey E. Ostrow (SBN 213118)
jostrow@stblaw.com
Michael H. Joshi (SBN 302184)
michael.joshi@stblaw.com
2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 251-5000
Facsimile: (650) 251-5002
6
7
8
9
13
Noah M. Leibowitz (Pro Hac Vice)
nleibowitz@stblaw.com
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
425 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10017
Telephone: (212) 455-2000
Facsimile: (212) 455-2502
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc.
10
11
12
15
16
DATED: April 20, 2018
SINGULARITY LLP
By:
17
/s/ Frank L. Bernstein
Frank L. Bernstein (State Bar No. 189504)
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 610
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 720-4650
Facsimile: (650) 720-4662
fbernstein@ipsingularity.com
18
19
20
William H. Mandir (Pro Hac Vice)
John F. Rabena (Pro Hac Vice)
Yoshinari Kishimoto (Pro Hac Vice)
Fadi Kiblawi (Pro Hac Vice)
Andrew Ritter (Pro Hac Vice)
Arun Shome (Pro Hac Vice)
SUGHRUE MION, PLLC
2100 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20037
Telephone: (202) 293-7060
Facsimile: (202) 293-7860
21
22
23
24
25
26
Attorneys for Defendants
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MOT. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SCHEDULE
-2-
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01097-EMC
1
2
3
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the
filing of this document has been obtained from Frank L. Bernstein.
4
5
/s/ Jeffrey E. Ostrow
Jeffrey E. Ostrow
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MOT. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SCHEDULE
-3-
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01097-EMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that the briefing and hearing
schedule on the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (D.I. 90) is amended as follows:
4
New Date
May 8, 2018
May 17, 2018
May 31, 2018 at 1:30 pm, or at
the Court’s convenience
8
9
RT
14
dwar
Judge E
ER
H
15
16
en
d M. Ch
NO
13
O ORD
IT IS S
R NIA
12
EDWARD M. CHEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICTED
ER JUDGE
UNIT
ED
11
RT
U
O
DATED:
S
4/23/2018
10
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
FO
7
Date Set Forth in D.I. 90
April 24, 2018
May 1, 2018
May 24, 2018 at 1:30 pm
LI
6
Event
Response due
Reply due
Motion hearing
A
5
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MOT. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SCHEDULE
-4-
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01097-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?