Fitbit, Inc. v. AliphCom et al

Filing 61

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/04/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FITBIT INC, Plaintiff, 8 ALIPHCOM, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 60 Defendants. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE v. 9 10 Case No. 3:17-cv-01139-WHO 12 Plaintiff Fitbit, Inc. has notified the Court that the parties have entered into a settlement 13 14 agreement and all claims of this case should be dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing 15 its own fees and costs. Dkt. No. 60. Fitbit’s motion is GRANTED, the hearing on the motion to 16 dismiss is VACATED and the case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule 17 of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. If defendants 18 disagree with this representation by plaintiff and with the resolution of this case as described 19 above, they shall file an opposition within ten days of the date below and the Court will reopen the 20 case. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 4, 2018 23 24 25 26 27 28 William H. Orrick United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?