Fitbit, Inc. v. AliphCom et al
Filing
61
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/04/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
FITBIT INC,
Plaintiff,
8
ALIPHCOM, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 60
Defendants.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH
PREJUDICE
v.
9
10
Case No. 3:17-cv-01139-WHO
12
Plaintiff Fitbit, Inc. has notified the Court that the parties have entered into a settlement
13
14
agreement and all claims of this case should be dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing
15
its own fees and costs. Dkt. No. 60. Fitbit’s motion is GRANTED, the hearing on the motion to
16
dismiss is VACATED and the case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule
17
of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. If defendants
18
disagree with this representation by plaintiff and with the resolution of this case as described
19
above, they shall file an opposition within ten days of the date below and the Court will reopen the
20
case.
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 4, 2018
23
24
25
26
27
28
William H. Orrick
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?