Moralez v. Bonfare Markets, Inc. et al

Filing 7

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 8/21/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

FRANCISCA MORALEZ,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 17-cv-01211-SI

v.
BONFARE MARKETS, INC., et al.,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Defendants.

12
13

Plaintiff Francisca Moralez filed this action on March 8, 2017. Docket No. 1. That same

14

day, the Court issued a scheduling order for cases asserting the denial of right of access under the

15

Americans with Disabilities Act. Docket No. 3. That order listed, among other items, a deadline

16

of June 21, 2017, for completion of a joint inspection of the premises. Id. at 1. Plaintiff’s “Notice

17

of Need for Mediation” was due 42 days later. Id. at 2. Plaintiff has filed nothing in this action

18

since April 2017.

19

Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before September 1, 2017, why this

20

case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff may do so by filing a status update

21

or a “Notice of Need for Mediation” no later than September 1, 2017. If plaintiff does not file a

22

status update or notice by this date, or otherwise receive permission of the Court, the Court may

23

dismiss this action for failure to prosecute.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 21, 2017
______________________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge