Weaver v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company
Filing
23
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Courtney Weaver filed by Courtney Weaver. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/3/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
COURTNEY WEAVER
CASE No C 3:17-cv-01242-EMC
Plaintiff(s)
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
CIGNA HEALTH & LIFE INS. CO.
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
■
Private ADR (specify process and provider)
Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
■
the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered. )
other requested deadline:
Date: 6/26/17
s/ Peter S. Sessions
Attorney for Plaintiff
s/ Sean P. Nalty
Attorney for Defendant
7/3/17
S
UNIT
ED
Date:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
x IT IS SO ORDERED
IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
R NIA
Date: 6/26/17
RT
FO
NO
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATEhen
JUDGE
.C
ward M
d
Judge E
Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017
A
H
LI
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed
ER
C
Order Selecting Private ADR.”
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?