Woolley et al v. Ygrene Energy Fund, Inc. et al
Filing
80
STIPULATED ESI DISCOVERY PROTOCOL ORDER. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 02/08/2018. (tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13 ANTHONY LOOK, et al.,
14
15
Case No. 3:17-cv-01258
Plaintiffs,
vs.
STIPULATED ESI DISCOVERY
PROTOCOL
16
17 YGRENE ENERGY FUND, INC. et al.,
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:17-cv-01258
STIPULATED ESI DISCOVERY PROTOCOL
1
Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and
2 agree to this ESI Protocol (“Protocol”) setting forth the specifications that shall govern document
3 production.
4
1.
5
This Order will govern discovery of electronically stored information (“ESI”) in this case
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
6 as a supplement to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court’s Guidelines for the Discovery
7 of Electronically Stored Information, and any other applicable orders and rules.
8
Nothing herein shall alter the parties’ respective rights or obligations under the Federal
9 Rules of Civil Procedure. Nothing in this Protocol establishes any agreement regarding the
10 subject matter or scope of discovery in this action, or the relevance or admissibility of any ESI or
11 other document or thing. Nothing in this Protocol shall affect, in any way, a producing party’s
12 right under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to seek or oppose reimbursement for costs
13 associated with collection, review, and/or production of ESI. Nothing in this Protocol shall be
14 interpreted to require disclosure of irrelevant information or ESI protected from discovery by the
15 attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege or immunity.
16
2.
17
The parties are aware of the importance the Court places on cooperation and commit to
COOPERATION
18 cooperate in good faith throughout the matter consistent with this Court’s Guidelines for the
19 Discovery of ESI.
20
3.
21
The parties have discussed their preservation obligations and needs and agree that
PRESERVATION
22 preservation of potentially relevant ESI will be reasonable and proportionate. To reduce the costs
23 and burdens of preservation and to ensure proper ESI is preserved, the parties agree that:
24
a)
Only ESI created or received between January 1, 2010 and the present will be
25
preserved;
26
b)
The parties have agreed on the types of ESI they believe should be preserved.
27
c)
The parties have agreed that the total number of custodians per side for whom ESI
28
will be preserved is 10, respectively. Custodians will be selected as follows:
Case No. 3:17-cv-01258
STIPULATED ESI DISCOVERY PROTOCOL
1
1)
Custodians of Defendants’ ESI: Defendants have already identified five
2
custodians for whom they believe ESI should be preserved. The parties will
3
identify up to five more custodians of Defendants’ ESI for whom ESI should be
4
preserved during the pendency of discovery. These additional five custodians will
5
be identified no later than April 1, 2018 or three (3) months after Ygrene begins its
6
rolling production of ESI, whichever is later.
7
2)
8
with this stipulation. The parties will identify up to four more custodians of
9
Plaintiffs’ ESI for whom ESI should be preserved during the pendency of
Custodians of Plaintiffs’ ESI: Each Plaintiff will preserve ESI in accordance
10
discovery. These additional four custodians will be identified no later than April 1,
11
2018.
12
d)
These data sources are not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost
13
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(B) and ESI from these sources will be preserved but
14
not searched, reviewed, or produced: backup media or other systems no longer in use that
15
can no longer reasonably be accessed;
16
e)
17
parties agree not to preserve the following: NONE.
18
f)
19
could contain relevant information but (b) under the proportionality factors, should not be
20
preserved: NONE.
21
4.
22
The parties shall meet and confer and reach agreement as to the method of searching, and
Among the sources of data the parties agree are not reasonably accessible, the
In addition to the agreements above, the parties agree data from these sources (a)
SEARCH
23 the words, terms, and phrases to be used to locate and identify potentially responsive ESI. The
24 parties shall also agree on the timing and conditions of any additional searches that may become
25 necessary in the normal course of discovery. In lieu of identifying responsive ESI using the search
26 terms and custodians/electronic systems as described above, a party may use a technology assisted
27 review platform to identify potentially relevant documents and ESI.
28
2
STIPULATED ESI DISCOVERY PROTOCOL
Case No. 3:17-cv-01258
1
5.
2
The parties agree to produce documents in
PRODUCTION FORMATS
PDF,
TIFF,
native and/or
paper file
3 formats or any combination thereof as appropriate. If particular documents warrant a different
4 format, the parties will cooperate to arrange for the mutually acceptable production of such
5 documents. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement, the parties may present the dispute for
6 judicial resolution regarding the form of production and any potential shifting of costs.
7
To the extent responding to a discovery request requires production of ESI contained in a
8 database, the producing party may comply with the discovery request by generating a report in a
9 reasonably usable and exportable electronic format. The parties agree not to degrade the
10 searchability of documents as part of the document production process. Common system and
11 program files as defined by the NIST library (which is commonly used by discovery vendors to
12 exclude system and program files from document review and production) need not be processed,
13 reviewed or produced. The parties shall meet and confer on any additional file types that also
14 need not be processed, reviewed, or produced. Productions can be transferred by any appropriate
15 and secure method agreed to by the parties.
16
6.
DOCUMENTS PROTECTED FROM DISCOVERY
17
a)
Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 502(d), the production of a privileged or work-product-
18
protected document, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of privilege or
19
protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. For
20
example, the mere production of privileged or work-product-protected documents in this
21
case as part of a mass production is not itself a waiver in this case or in any other federal or
22
state proceeding.
23
b)
24
26(b)(5) whereby the producing party may clawback any document that is produced,
25
inadvertently or otherwise, and that is protected from discovery by the attorney-client
26
privilege, work product doctrine, or other privilege. The producing party will give notice
27
of its intent to clawback documents by identifying the documents by Bates number as soon
28
as reasonably practical. Upon receipt of such notice, the receiving party will return all
The parties have agreed upon a “clawback” process pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
3
STIPULATED ESI DISCOVERY PROTOCOL
Case No. 3:17-cv-01258
1
documents identified by the producing party and simultaneously delete all copies thereof.
2
c)
3
need not be placed on a privilege log. Communications may be identified on a privilege
4
log by category, rather than individually, if appropriate.
5
7.
6
This Stipulated Order may be modified by a Stipulated Order of the parties or by the Court
Communications involving trial counsel that post-date the filing of the complaint
MODIFICATION
7 for good cause shown.
8
9
IT IS SO STIPULATED, through Counsel of Record.
10
11
Dated: January 30, 2018
12
13
/s/ Jeffrey D. Kaliel
Counsel for Plaintiff
Dated: January 30, 2018
14
/s/ Fredrick S. Levin
Counsel for Defendant
15
16
IT IS ORDERED that the forgoing Agreement is approved.
17
18 Dated: February 8, 2018
19
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATED ESI DISCOVERY PROTOCOL
Case No. 3:17-cv-01258
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?