Liveperson, Inc. v. 24/7 Customer, Inc.

Filing 502

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 499 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulated Motion to Enlarge Time to Complete Supplemental Expert Discovery filed by LivePerson, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 3, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Michael W. De Vries (S.B.N. 211001)
Sharre Lotfollahi (S.B.N. 258913)
Benjamin A. Herbert (S.B.N. 277356)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Adam R. Alper (S.B.N. 196834)
James W. Beard (S.B.N. 267242)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
555 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

Darin W. Snyder (S.B.N. 136003)
Mark E. Miller (S.B.N. 130200)
Geoffrey H. Yost (S.B.N. 159687)
Alexander B. Parker (S.B.N. 264705)
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3823
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant [24]7.ai, Inc.

Joshua L. Simmons (admitted pro hac vice)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
601 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022-4611
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff LivePerson, Inc.

18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

21
22
23
24

LivePerson, Inc.,
v.
[24]7.ai, Inc.,

Plaintiff,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:17-CV-01268-JST
STIPULATED MOTION TO ENLARGE
TIME TO COMPLETE SUPPLEMENTAL
EXPERT DISCOVERY

25
26
27
28
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01268-JST

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff LivePerson, Inc. (“LivePerson”) and Defendant [24]7.ai,
Inc. (“[24]7”, and collectively with LivePerson, “the Parties”), subject to the Court’s approval and
Order, stipulate to enlarge time for the Parties to serve supplemental expert reports and complete
associated expert depositions. The Parties seek this enlargement in order to allow the Parties to
evaluate and conference regarding the Court’s Order Regarding Motions to Exclude Expert
Testimony, issued earlier today, November 30, 2018 without prejudice to either or both Parties
seeking further relief if appropriate or to taking any positions with respect thereto.
I.

On October 26, 2018, based on a determination that the decision in E.J. Brooks Company v.
Cambridge Security Seals, 31 N.Y.3d 441 (2018) was a change in law and in response to
LivePerson’s request, this Court “grant[ed] LivePerson’s request to allow Dr. Choi to supplement his
report.” ECF 484 at 29. In accordance with that determination, the parties subsequently submitted a
stipulation that included deadlines for service of that supplemental report, for service of a rebuttal
report, and to complete additional depositions on those reports, which was entered as an order by the
Court. ECF 491. That stipulated order set Tuesday, December 4, 2018 as the deadline for
LivePerson to serve a supplemental report from Dr. Choi, January 15, 2019 as the deadline to serve a
rebuttal report, and January 25, 2019 as the deadline to complete associated depositions. Id.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Earlier today, November 30, 2018, the Court issued an order granting [24]7’s Motion to
Exclude Certain Testimony of Dr. William Choi. ECF 498 (“Daubert Order”). Given the pending
deadline for service of Dr. Choi’s supplemental expert report, the Parties met and conferred on
November 30, 2018 regarding a brief extension of the supplemental report deadlines in order to
permit the Parties to evaluate and conference regarding the Court’s Daubert Order. See L.R. 37-1.
The Parties agreed on a one-week extension of those deadlines, subject to the Court’s approval,
without prejudice to either or both Parties seeking further relief if appropriate or to taking any
positions with respect thereto.
II.

PROPOSED SCHEDULE
The Parties now stipulate to the request to enlarge time, as set forth below:

28
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME

1

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01268-JST

1

Event
Choi supplemental report

Proposed Deadline
December 11, 2018

Stuckwisch supplemental report

January 15, 2018

January 22, 2018

Completion of further depositions on
supplemental reports

2

Current Deadline1
December 4, 2018

January 25, 2019

February 1, 2019

3
4
5
6
The Parties make this Stipulation without prejudice to requests for further relief or to either

7
8
9
10

or both Parties’ positions with respect to the Court’s Daubert Order. For the foregoing reasons, the
Parties respectfully request this Court grant this stipulated motion to enlarge time for supplemental
expert discovery as set forth above in accordance with this stipulation.

11

Dated: November 30, 2018

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

12
13

By:

14
15

/s/ Michael W. De Vries
Michael W. De Vries

Attorney for
LIVEPERSON, INC.

16
17

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

Dated: November 30, 2018

18
19

By:

20
21

/s/ Darin W. Snyder
Darin W. Snyder

Attorney for
[24]7.AI, INC.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

ECF 491.

STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME

2

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01268-JST

1
2
3

ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from Darin W. Snyder.

4
/s/ Michael W. De Vries
Michael W. De Vries

5
6
7
8
9

[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11

December 3, 2018
Dated: ___________________________

_____________________________
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME

3

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01268-JST