Castellanos v. Frauenheim

Filing 24

ORDER by Judge James Donato granting 23 Motion to Stay. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2018)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

ROLANDO CASTELLANOS,
Petitioner,

8
9
10

v.
SCOTT FRAUENHEIM,
Respondent.

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 17-cv-01307-JD

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
STAY AND
ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING
CASE
Re: Dkt. No. 23

12
13

Rolando Castellanos, a California prisoner, proceeds with a pro se petition for a writ of

14

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The original petition was dismissed with leave to

15

amend or for petitioner to file a motion to stay this action while he exhausts a new claim.

16

Petitioner has filed a motion stay pursuant to Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2003)

17

and King v. Ryan, 564 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 2009). A petitioner seeking to avail himself of the

18

Kelly three-step procedure is not required to show good cause, as under Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S.

19

269 (2005), but rather must show that the amendment of any newly exhausted claims back into the

20

petition satisfies both Mayle v. Felix, 545 U.S. 644, 655 (2005), by sharing a “common core of

21

operative facts” and Duncan v. Walker, 533 U.S. 167 (2001), by complying with the statute of

22

limitations. King, 564 F.3d at 1141-43. Petitioner has failed to present any arguments that the

23

newly exhausted claim shares a common core of operative facts and will comply with the statute

24

of limitations.

25

Yet, liberally construing the motion, petitioner has shown good cause for his failure to

26

exhaust the claim before filing this action, the claim does not appear patently meritless, and there

27

does not appear to be any intentionally dilatory litigation tactic by petitioner. See Rhines, 544

28

U.S. at 277-78. Petitioner is informed that before he may challenge either the fact or length of his

1

confinement in a habeas petition in this court, he must present to the California Supreme Court

2

any claims he wishes to raise in this Court. See Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 522 (1982) (holding

3

every claim raised in federal habeas petition must be exhausted).
CONCLUSION

4
5

1. Petitioner’s motion for a stay (Docket No. 23) is GRANTED and this case is STAYED

6

to allow petitioner to present his unexhausted claim in state court. If petitioner is not granted relief

7

in state court, he may return to this Court and ask that the stay be lifted.

8

2. The stay is subject to the following conditions:

9

(1) Petitioner must diligently pursue his state court habeas proceedings; and

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

(2) Petitioner must notify this Court within thirty days after the state courts have completed
their review of his claim or after they have refused review of his claims.
If either condition of the stay is not satisfied, this Court may vacate the stay and act on this

13

petition. See Rhines, 544 U.S. at 278 (district court must effectuate timeliness concerns of

14

AEDPA by placing “reasonable limits on a petitioner’s trip to state court and back.”).

15

The Clerk shall administratively close this case. The closure has no legal effect; it is

16

purely a statistical matter. The case will be reopened and the stay vacated upon notification by

17

petitioner in accordance with section (2) above.

18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 21, 2018

20
21
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

ROLANDO CASTELLANOS,

Case No. 17-cv-01307-JD

Plaintiff,
5
v.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

6
7

SCOTT FRAUENHEIM,
Defendant.

8
9
10

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15

That on June 21, 2018, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

16
17
18

Rolando Castellanos ID: AT2857
Folsom State Prison
P.O. Box 950
Folsom, CA 95763

19
20
21

Dated: June 21, 2018

22
23

Susan Y. Soong
Clerk, United States District Court

24
25
26
27

By:________________________
LISA R. CLARK, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable JAMES DONATO

28
3