Bonilla v. Eller et al
Filing
3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; DENYING 2 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 3/24/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA,
Case No. 17-cv-01310-VC (PR)
Plaintiff,
v.
STAN ELLER, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE; DENYING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
Re: Dkt. No. 2
Plaintiff Steven Wayne Bonilla, a state inmate, has filed a pro se civil action under 42
U.S.C. § 1983 against Mono County Superior Court Judge Stan Eller and Mono County Superior
Court Clerk H. Kenney. Bonilla has also filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
Bonilla has been disqualified from proceeding in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)
unless he is “under imminent danger of serious physical injury” at the time he filed his
complaint. 28 U.S.C. 1915(g); In re Steven Bonilla, No. C 11-3180 CW (PR); Bonilla v.
Dawson, No. C 13-0951 CW (PR).
The allegations in this complaint do not show that Bonilla was in imminent danger at the
time of filing. Therefore, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Moreover, even if
the IFP application were granted, his lawsuit would be barred under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S.
477, 486-87 (1994). Accordingly, the case is dismissed with prejudice.
The Clerk shall close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 24, 2017
______________________________________
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?