Andersen Tax LLC v. Laffont-Reveilhac et al
Filing
70
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 69 Stipulation filed by Andersen Tax LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/31/18. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
COOLEY LLP
JOHN W. CRITTENDEN (101634)
jcrittenden@cooley.com
CHANTAL Z. HWANG (275236)
chwang@cooley.com
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone:
(415) 693-2000
Facsimile:
(415) 693-2222
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Andersen Tax LLC
SCHINNER & SHAIN, LLP
FREDERICK K. KOENEN (124555)
koenen@schinner.com
REED E. HARVEY (161318)
harvey@schinner.com
ALICE DUCLOS (301400)
alice@schinner.com
96 Jessie Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 369-9050
Facsimile: (415) 369-9053
Attorneys for Defendants
Arthur Andersen & Co., SAS,
Stéphane Laffont-Réveilhac,
and Véronique Martinez
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
ANDERSEN TAX LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company,
15
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
19
20
21
Case No. 3:17-cv-01311-EMC
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
v.
STÉPHANE LAFFONT-RÉVEILHAC, an
individual; VÉRONIQUE MARTINEZ, an
individual; ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.,
SAS, a Société par Actions Simplifiée under
the laws of France; and MOHALA
ENTERPRISES, LLC D/B/A SUNDIAL
CONSULTING, a California limited liability
company,
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
163888590
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01311-EMC
1
Plaintiff Andersen Tax LLC (“Plaintiff”) and defendants Stéphane Laffont-Réveilhac
2
(“Laffont-Réveilhac”), Véronique Martinez (“Martinez”), Arthur Andersen & Co., SAS (“AA&C”)
3
(“Defendants”) (collectively the “Parties”), by and through undersigned counsel, reached a
4
settlement in the above-captioned matter before the Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte, which the
5
Parties placed on record on January 11, 2018. The terms of settlement were subsequently
6
confirmed in a confidential settlement agreement signed by the Parties.
7
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties that, pursuant
8
to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all claims and counterclaims raised
9
in this action by the Parties should be dismissed with prejudice with each of the Parties to bear its
10
own attorneys’ fees and costs.
11
Dated: January 29, 2018
COOLEY LLP
12
13
/s/ John W. Crittenden
JOHN W. CRITTENDEN (101634)
CHANTAL Z. HWANG (275236)
Attorneys for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant
Andersen Tax LLC
14
15
16
17
Dated: January 29, 2018
SCHINNER & SHAIN, LLP
18
/s/ Reed E. Harvey
FREDERICK K. KOENEN (SBN124555)
REED E. HARVEY (SBN 161318)
ALICE DUCLOS (SBN 301400)
Attorneys for Defendants-Counter-Claimant
Arthur Andersen & Co., SAS,
Stéphane Laffont-Réveilhac,
and Véronique Martinez
19
20
21
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
shall close this case.
S
. Chen
dward M
Judge E
H
ER
FO
163888590
RT
SAN FRANCISCO
R NIA
NO
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ERED
O ORD D
IT IS S
FIE
DI
AS MO
A
28
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
LI
UNIT
ED
27
The Clerk of the Court
RT
U
O
26
All days are vacated.
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
1.
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01311-EMC
1
ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING
2
Pursuant to N.D. Cal. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this
3
document has been obtained from counsel for Defendants.
4
Dated: January 29, 2018
COOLEY LLP
5
6
/s/ John W. Crittenden
JOHN W. CRITTENDEN (101634)
CHANTAL Z. HWANG (275236)
Attorneys for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant
Andersen Tax LLC
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
163888590
2.
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01311-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?