Andersen Tax LLC v. Laffont-Reveilhac et al

Filing 70

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 69 Stipulation filed by Andersen Tax LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/31/18. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 COOLEY LLP JOHN W. CRITTENDEN (101634) jcrittenden@cooley.com CHANTAL Z. HWANG (275236) chwang@cooley.com 101 California Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5800 Telephone: (415) 693-2000 Facsimile: (415) 693-2222 Attorneys for Plaintiff Andersen Tax LLC SCHINNER & SHAIN, LLP FREDERICK K. KOENEN (124555) koenen@schinner.com REED E. HARVEY (161318) harvey@schinner.com ALICE DUCLOS (301400) alice@schinner.com 96 Jessie Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 369-9050 Facsimile: (415) 369-9053 Attorneys for Defendants Arthur Andersen & Co., SAS, Stéphane Laffont-Réveilhac, and Véronique Martinez 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 ANDERSEN TAX LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 15 Plaintiff, 16 17 18 19 20 21 Case No. 3:17-cv-01311-EMC STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE v. STÉPHANE LAFFONT-RÉVEILHAC, an individual; VÉRONIQUE MARTINEZ, an individual; ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO., SAS, a Société par Actions Simplifiée under the laws of France; and MOHALA ENTERPRISES, LLC D/B/A SUNDIAL CONSULTING, a California limited liability company, Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 163888590 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01311-EMC 1 Plaintiff Andersen Tax LLC (“Plaintiff”) and defendants Stéphane Laffont-Réveilhac 2 (“Laffont-Réveilhac”), Véronique Martinez (“Martinez”), Arthur Andersen & Co., SAS (“AA&C”) 3 (“Defendants”) (collectively the “Parties”), by and through undersigned counsel, reached a 4 settlement in the above-captioned matter before the Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte, which the 5 Parties placed on record on January 11, 2018. The terms of settlement were subsequently 6 confirmed in a confidential settlement agreement signed by the Parties. 7 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties that, pursuant 8 to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all claims and counterclaims raised 9 in this action by the Parties should be dismissed with prejudice with each of the Parties to bear its 10 own attorneys’ fees and costs. 11 Dated: January 29, 2018 COOLEY LLP 12 13 /s/ John W. Crittenden JOHN W. CRITTENDEN (101634) CHANTAL Z. HWANG (275236) Attorneys for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant Andersen Tax LLC 14 15 16 17 Dated: January 29, 2018 SCHINNER & SHAIN, LLP 18 /s/ Reed E. Harvey FREDERICK K. KOENEN (SBN124555) REED E. HARVEY (SBN 161318) ALICE DUCLOS (SBN 301400) Attorneys for Defendants-Counter-Claimant Arthur Andersen & Co., SAS, Stéphane Laffont-Réveilhac, and Véronique Martinez 19 20 21 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 shall close this case. S . Chen dward M Judge E H ER FO 163888590 RT SAN FRANCISCO R NIA NO COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW ERED O ORD D IT IS S FIE DI AS MO A 28 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T LI UNIT ED 27 The Clerk of the Court RT U O 26 All days are vacated. N F D IS T IC T O R C 1. STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01311-EMC 1 ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING 2 Pursuant to N.D. Cal. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this 3 document has been obtained from counsel for Defendants. 4 Dated: January 29, 2018 COOLEY LLP 5 6 /s/ John W. Crittenden JOHN W. CRITTENDEN (101634) CHANTAL Z. HWANG (275236) Attorneys for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant Andersen Tax LLC 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 163888590 2. STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01311-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?