Jimenez v. City of Napa et al

Filing 41

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 39 FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE filed by Janet Jimenez. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/15/18. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2018)

1
2
3
4

JOHN L. BURRIS, ESQ. SBN 69888
BENJAMIN NISENBAUM, ESQ. SBN 222173
JAMES COOK, ESQ., SBN 300212
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, CA 94621
Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]

5
6

Attorneys for Plaintiff
JANET JIMENEZ

7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Gregory M. Fox, State Bar No. 070876
Joanne Tran, State Bar No. 294402
BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL
2749 Hyde Street
San Francisco, California 94109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorney for Defendants
CITY OF NAPA and THOMAS KEENER

14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17
18

JANET JIMENEZ, individually and as
successor-in-interest to Decedent JAIME
JIMENEZ,

Case No. 17-cv-01352-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff,

19
20

v.

21

CITY OF NAPA, a municipal corporation;
JOHN CORRIGAN, individually and in his
capacity as a Sergeant for the Napa Police
Department; THOMAS KEENER, individually
and in his capacity as an officer for the Napa
Police Department; ADAM DAVIS,
individually and in his capacity as an officer for
the Napa Police Department; CURTIS
MADRIGAL, individually and in his capacity
as an officer for the Napa Police Department
and DOES 1-50, inclusive,

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
31

Hon. Edward M. Chen

Defendants.
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
U.S. District Court Case No.3:17-cv-01352-EMC:

1
2

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties, following the death of Plaintiff JANET

3

JIMENEZ, through her immediate successors-in-interest, adult children Monica Linarte and Reyna

4

Menendez, that the above-entitled is hereby dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, all parties to bear

5

their own fees and costs.

6

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

7
8
Dated: May 9, 2018

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN BURRIS

9
10

By: /s/Benjamin Nisenbaum
John Burris
Ben Nisenbaum
James Cook
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JANET JIMENEZ

11
12
13
14
15

Dated: May 9, 2018

BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL

16
17
18
19

By: /s/
Gregory M. Fox
Joanne Tran
Attorney for Defendants
CITY OF NAPA and THOMAS KEENER

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
31

2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
U.S. District Court Case No.3:17-cv-01352-EMC:

1
2
3
4

ATTORNEY ATTESTATION
I, Benjamin Nisenbaum, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to

5

file the foregoing documents. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1(i), I hereby attest that concurrence in the

6

filing of these documents has been obtained from each of its Signatories.

7
Dated: May 10, 2018

/s/ Benjamin Nisenbaum
Ben Nisenbaum

8
9
10

ORDER

11

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, THE ABVOE-ENTITLED ACTION IS HEREBY
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, EACH PARTY TO BEAR ITS OWN FEES AND COSTS.

13

S

Hon. Edward M. Chen
United States D JudgeERED

O ORD

IT IS S

17

ER

LI

J

A

H

20

RT

19

. Chen

ward M
udge Ed

NO

18

N

21

F
D IS T IC T O
R

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
31

R NIA

16

UNIT
ED

15

5/15/2018

DATED:

RT
U
O

14

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

FO

12

3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
U.S. District Court Case No.3:17-cv-01352-EMC:

C