Wheelabrator Technologies Inc. v. Factory Mutual Insurance Company

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. The parties' stipulation is approved, without preclusion of required participation in additional ADR process. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 07/03/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2017)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Wheelabrator Technologies Inc. CASE No C 17-1357-MMC Plaintiff(s) v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Factory Mutual Insurance Company Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) Private ADR (specify process and provider) The parties have already participated in mediation with Mr. David Geronemus of JAMS New York. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: ■ Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) ■ other requested deadline: June 15, 2017 Date: June 27, 2017 Date: June 29, 2017 /s/ Geoffrey Greeves Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Joyce Wang Attorney for Defendant IT IS SO ORDERED X IT IS SO ORDERED, WITH MODIFICATIONS: without preclusion of required participation in additional ADR process. Date: July 3, 2017 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?