Lyttle v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company

Filing 42

ORDER granting 41 Stipulation to continue hearing as to 32 , 33 Cross Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Motion Hearing reset for 5/16/2018 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor before Judge William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/28/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Jodi K. Swick No. 228634 Charan M. Higbee No.148293 McDOWELL HETHERINGTON LLP 1 Kaiser Plaza, Suite 340 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: 510.628.2145 Facsimile: 510.628.2146 Email: jodi.swick@mhllp.com charan.higbee@mhllp.com Attorneys for Defendant UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 SHELLEY LYTTLE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Case No 3:17-cv-01361-WHO STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE APRIL 11, 2018 HEARING DATE ON PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AND ORDER Current Hearing Date: April 11, 2018 Time: 2:00 PM Location: 17th Floor Courtroom: Courtroom 2 Judge: William H. Orrick, III 18 19 Complaint Filed: March 14, 2017 20 21 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between plaintiff Shelley Lyttle and Defendant 22 United of Omaha Life Insurance Company (“United of Omaha”), through their attorneys of 23 record, as follows: 24 1. On January 31, 2018, plaintiff Shelley Lyttle and defendant United of Omaha filed 25 cross-motions for court judgment which were set for hearing on March 28, 2018 in Courtroom 2 26 of this Court [Docs. 32 and 33]; 27 28 2. On March 20, 2018, the Court issued a notice re-setting the hearing on the cross- motions for judgment to April 11, 2018 [Doc. 40]; Case No 3:17-cv-01361-WHO 1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE APRIL 11, 2018 HEARING DATE ON PARTIES’ CROSSMOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AND ORDER 1 3. Both attorneys of record for defendant United of Omaha, Jodi K. Swick and 2 Charan M. Higbee, are unavailable for the reset hearing date of April 11, 2018, because they 3 have pre-paid plans to meet with clients in New York and Boston between April 9, 2018 and 4 April 13, 2018; 5 4. 6 7 Counsel for all parties are available for a hearing on May 9, 2018 or May 16, 2018 at 2:00 p.m.; 5. The parties, through their undersigned attorneys, therefore agree that the hearing 8 date on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment may be moved to May 9, 2018 or May 16, 2018 9 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2 of this Court; 10 6. 11 obstruction; and 12 7. 13 This stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay or This stipulation to continue the hearing date on the parties’ cross-motions does not alter the date of any other event or deadline already fixed by Court Order. 14 15 Dated: March 28, 2018 McDOWELL HETHERINGTON LLP 16 17 By: 18 19 Attorneys for Defendant UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 20 21 22 /s/ Charan M. Higbee Jodi K. Swick Charan M. Higbee Dated: March 28, 2018 ERISA LAW CENTER 23 24 25 By: /s/ Robert J. Rosati Robert J. Rosati 26 27 Attorney for Plaintiff SHELLEY LYTTLE 28 Case No 3:17-cv-01361-WHO 2 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE APRIL 11, 2018 HEARING DATE ON PARTIES’ CROSSMOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AND ORDER 1 ORDER 2 Having read the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby 3 4 5 6 ordered as follows: 1. The hearing date on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment as a matter of law, currently set for April 11, 2018, hereby is continued to May 16, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2 of this Court. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 28, 2018 10 11 12 HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No 3:17-cv-01361-WHO 3 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE APRIL 11, 2018 HEARING DATE ON PARTIES’ CROSSMOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?