Connelly v. Branch et al

Filing 7

ORDER REMANDING CASE.. Signed by Judge James Donato on 6/22/17. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN CONNELLY, 7 Plaintiff, 8 ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT v. 9 R. BRANCH, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 17-cv-01407-JD 12 This pro se prisoner’s civil action was originally filed in Monterey County Superior Court. 13 14 Defendants removed the case to this Court on March 15, 2017. On April 7, 2017, the Court 15 screened the complaint and dismissed it with leave to amend. Nearly the same day the Court 16 issued its screening order, plaintiff filed an objection to the removal, but the Court was unaware of 17 that order while screening the case. Plaintiff has also filed a first amended complaint where he 18 repeats his objections to removal. Plaintiff states that there are no federal claims and the case only 19 contains state law claims regarding inadequate medical care in state prison. Defendants have not 20 responded to plaintiff’s filings regarding returning to state court. 21 Because plaintiff has expressly disavowed any federal claims, the case will be remanded to 22 state court so that plaintiff may litigate in his chosen forum.1 See Swett v. Schenk, 792 F.2d 1447, 23 1450 (9th Cir. 1986) (“it is within the district court’s discretion, once the basis for removal 24 jurisdiction is dropped, whether to hear the rest of the action or remand it to the state court from 25 which it was removed”); Plute v. Roadway Package System, Inc., 141 F. Supp. 2d 1005, 1007 26 (N.D. Cal. 2001) (court may remand sua sponte or on motion of a party). The action is 27 1 28 While plaintiff uses the term “deliberate indifference” which is associated with inadequate medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment, he is clear that there are no federal claims. 1 REMANDED to the Monterey County Superior Court for such other and further proceedings as 2 that court deems proper. The Clerk shall close the file and send the necessary materials to the 3 Monterey County Superior Court for the remand. 4 5 6 7 In light of the remand to state court, all pending motions are dismissed as moot. All further motions must be filed in state court IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 22, 2017 8 9 JAMES DONATO United States District Judge 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 JOHN CONNELLY, Case No. 17-cv-01407-JD Plaintiff, 5 v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 6 7 R. BRANCH, et al., Defendants. 8 9 10 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 That on June 22, 2017, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 16 17 18 John Connelly ID: H-83535 Correctional Training Facility (CTF) P.O. Box 705 Soledad, CA 93960 19 20 21 Dated: June 22, 2017 22 23 Susan Y. Soong Clerk, United States District Court 24 25 26 27 By:________________________ LISA R. CLARK, Deputy Clerk to the Honorable JAMES DONATO 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?