Connelly v. Branch et al
Filing
7
ORDER REMANDING CASE.. Signed by Judge James Donato on 6/22/17. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
JOHN CONNELLY,
7
Plaintiff,
8
ORDER REMANDING ACTION
TO STATE COURT
v.
9
R. BRANCH, et al.,
10
Defendants.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 17-cv-01407-JD
12
This pro se prisoner’s civil action was originally filed in Monterey County Superior Court.
13
14
Defendants removed the case to this Court on March 15, 2017. On April 7, 2017, the Court
15
screened the complaint and dismissed it with leave to amend. Nearly the same day the Court
16
issued its screening order, plaintiff filed an objection to the removal, but the Court was unaware of
17
that order while screening the case. Plaintiff has also filed a first amended complaint where he
18
repeats his objections to removal. Plaintiff states that there are no federal claims and the case only
19
contains state law claims regarding inadequate medical care in state prison. Defendants have not
20
responded to plaintiff’s filings regarding returning to state court.
21
Because plaintiff has expressly disavowed any federal claims, the case will be remanded to
22
state court so that plaintiff may litigate in his chosen forum.1 See Swett v. Schenk, 792 F.2d 1447,
23
1450 (9th Cir. 1986) (“it is within the district court’s discretion, once the basis for removal
24
jurisdiction is dropped, whether to hear the rest of the action or remand it to the state court from
25
which it was removed”); Plute v. Roadway Package System, Inc., 141 F. Supp. 2d 1005, 1007
26
(N.D. Cal. 2001) (court may remand sua sponte or on motion of a party). The action is
27
1
28
While plaintiff uses the term “deliberate indifference” which is associated with inadequate
medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment, he is clear that there are no federal claims.
1
REMANDED to the Monterey County Superior Court for such other and further proceedings as
2
that court deems proper. The Clerk shall close the file and send the necessary materials to the
3
Monterey County Superior Court for the remand.
4
5
6
7
In light of the remand to state court, all pending motions are dismissed as moot. All
further motions must be filed in state court
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 22, 2017
8
9
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
JOHN CONNELLY,
Case No. 17-cv-01407-JD
Plaintiff,
5
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
6
7
R. BRANCH, et al.,
Defendants.
8
9
10
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
That on June 22, 2017, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
16
17
18
John Connelly ID: H-83535
Correctional Training Facility (CTF)
P.O. Box 705
Soledad, CA 93960
19
20
21
Dated: June 22, 2017
22
23
Susan Y. Soong
Clerk, United States District Court
24
25
26
27
By:________________________
LISA R. CLARK, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable JAMES DONATO
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?